Malaria Journal

official impact factor 3.49

Open Access Research

Shift in epitope dominance of IgM and IgG responses to Plasmodium falciparum MSP1 block 4

Sandra P Chang1*, Alexander KK Kayatani1, Zilka I Terrientes2, Socrates Herrera3, Rose GF Leke4 and Diane W Taylor1

Author Affiliations

1 John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 651 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA

2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Panama, Apartado 0819-05523, El Dorado, Panama City, Panama

3 Instituto de Inmunología, Edificio de Microbiología, Tercer Piso, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Sede San Fernando, Cali, Colombia

4 Faculty of Medicine & Biomedical Research, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon

For all author emails, please log on.

Malaria Journal 2010, 9:14 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-14

Published: 13 January 2010

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1) has been extensively studied as a blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate, with most work focused on the conserved 19 kDa and semi-conserved 42 kDa C-terminal regions (blocks 16-17) and the hypervariable N-terminal repeat region (block 2). However, recent genotyping studies suggest that additional regions of MSP1 may be under selective pressure, including a locus of intragenic recombination designated as block 4 within the 3' region of the gene.

Methods

The current study examined the antibody response to the two parental and two recombinant forms of block 4 and to blocks 16-17 (3D7) in study populations from Colombia, Papua New Guinea and Cameroon that differ in malaria transmission intensity and ethnic composition.

Results

IgM and IgG antibodies were detected against parental and recombinant MSP1 block 4 peptides in all three populations. Overall, 32-44% of the individuals produced IgM to one or more of the peptides, with most individuals having IgM antibodies reactive with both parental and recombinant forms. In contrast, IgG seropositivity to block 4 varied among populations (range 15-65%), with the majority of antibodies showing specificity for one or a pair of block 4 peptides. The IgG response to block 4 was significantly lower than that to blocks 16-17, indicating block 4 is subdominant. Antibodies to block 4 and blocks 16-17 displayed distinct IgG subclass biases, with block 4 responses biased toward IgG3 and blocks 16-17 toward IgG1. These patterns of responsiveness were consistently observed in the three study populations.

Conclusions

Production of antibodies specific for each parental and recombinant MSP1 block 4 allele in different populations exposed to P. falciparum is consistent with balancing selection of the MSP1 block 4 region by the immune response of individuals in areas of both low and high malaria transmission. MSP1 block 4 determinants may be important in isolate-specific immunity to P. falciparum.