Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Plasmodium vivax trophozoites insensitive to chloroquine

Wesley W Sharrock1, Rossarin Suwanarusk12, Usa Lek-Uthai3, Michael D Edstein4, Varakorn Kosaisavee3, Thomas Travers4, Anchalee Jaidee5, Kanlaya Sriprawat5, Ric N Price16, François Nosten567 and Bruce Russell12*

Author Affiliations

1 International Health Program, Infectious Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia

2 Laboratory of Malaria Immunobiology, Singapore Immunology Network, Biopolis, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore

3 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

4 Department of Therapeutic evaluation, Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Australia

5 Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mae Sod, Thailand

6 Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, CCVTM, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK

7 Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Rajvithi Road, Bangkok Thailand

For all author emails, please log on.

Malaria Journal 2008, 7:94  doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-94

Published: 27 May 2008

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium vivax is a major cause of malaria and is still primarily treated with chloroquine. Chloroquine inhibits the polymerization of haem to inert haemozoin. Free haem monomers are thought to catalyze oxidative damage to the Plasmodium spp. trophozoite, the stage when haemoglobin catabolism is maximal. However preliminary in vitro observations on P. vivax clinical isolates suggest that only ring stages (early trophozoites) are sensitive to chloroquine. In this study, the stage specific action of chloroquine was investigated in synchronous cryopreserved isolates of P. vivax.

Methods

The in vitro chloroquine sensitivity of paired ring and trophozoite stages from 11 cryopreserved P. vivax clinical isolates from Thailand and two Plasmodium falciparum clones (chloroquine resistant K1 and chloroquine sensitive FC27) was measured using a modified WHO microtest method and fluorometric SYBR Green I Assay. The time each stage was exposed to chloroquine treatment was controlled by washing the chloroquine off at 20 hours after the beginning of treatment.

Results

Plasmodium vivax isolates added to the assay at ring stage had significantly lower median IC50s to chloroquine than the same isolates added at trophozoite stage (median IC50 12 nM vs 415 nM p < 0.01). Although only 36% (4/11) of the SYBR Green I assays for P. vivax were successful, both microscopy and SYBR Green I assays indicated that only P. vivax trophozoites were able to develop to schizonts at chloroquine concentrations above 100 nM.

Conclusion

Data from this study confirms the diminished sensitivity of P. vivax trophozoites to chloroquine, the stage thought to be the target of this drug. These results raise important questions about the pharmacodynamic action of chloroquine, and highlight a fundamental difference in the activity of chloroquine between P. vivax and P. falciparum.