Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Malaria Journal and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research

An exploratory study of community factors relevant for participatory malaria control on Rusinga Island, western Kenya

Pamela Opiyo1, W Richard Mukabana2, Ibrahim Kiche3, Evan Mathenge2, Gerry F Killeen456 and Ulrike Fillinger6*

Author Affiliations

1 SNV Netherlands Development Organisation, P.O Box 410576, Kasama, Zambia

2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100 GPO, Nairobi, Kenya

3 Christian Children's Fund (CCF), Nairobi, Kenya

4 Ifakara Health Research and Development Centre, Public Health Entomology Unit, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

5 Swiss Tropical Institute, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Socinstrasse 57, Basel, CH-4002, Switzerland

6 Durham University, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

Malaria Journal 2007, 6:48  doi:10.1186/1475-2875-6-48

Published: 24 April 2007

Abstract

Background

Capacity strengthening of rural communities, and the various actors that support them, is needed to enable them to lead their own malaria control programmes. Here the existing capacity of a rural community in western Kenya was evaluated in preparation for a larger intervention.

Methods

Focus group discussions and semi-structured individual interviews were carried out in 1,451 households to determine (1) demographics of respondent and household; (2) socio-economic status of the household; (3) knowledge and beliefs about malaria (symptoms, prevention methods, mosquito life cycle); (4) typical practices used for malaria prevention; (5) the treatment-seeking behaviour and household expenditure for malaria treatment; and (6) the willingness to prepare and implement community-based vector control.

Results

Malaria was considered a major threat to life but relevant knowledge was a chimera of scientific knowledge and traditional beliefs, which combined with socio-economic circumstances, leads to ineffective malaria prevention. The actual malaria prevention behaviour practiced by community members differed significantly from methods known to the respondents. Beside bednet use, the major interventions implemented were bush clearing and various hygienic measures, even though these are ineffective for malaria prevention. Encouragingly, most respondents believed malaria could be controlled and were willing to contribute to a community-based malaria control program but felt they needed outside assistance.

Conclusion

Culturally sensitive but evidence-based education interventions, utilizing participatory tools, are urgently required which consider traditional beliefs and enable understanding of causal connections between mosquito ecology, parasite transmission and the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of disease. Community-based organizations and schools need to be equipped with knowledge through partnerships with national and international research and tertiary education institutions so that evidence-based research can be applied at the grassroots level.