<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Malaria Journal - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Malaria Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/378" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/352" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/29" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/28" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/34" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/22" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/378">
        <title>A new world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2010 </title>
        <description>Background:
Transmission intensity affects almost all aspects of malaria epidemiology and the impact of malaria on human populations. Maps of transmission intensity are necessary to identify populations at different levels of risk and to evaluate objectively options for disease control. To remain relevant operationally, such maps must be updated frequently. Following the first global effort to map Plasmodium falciparum malaria endemicity in 2007, this paper describes the generation of a new world map for the year 2010. This analysis is extended to provide the first global estimates of two other metrics of transmission intensity for P. falciparum that underpin contemporary questions in malaria control: the entomological inoculation rate (PfEIR) and the basic reproductive number (PfR).
Methods:
Annual parasite incidence data for 13,449 administrative units in 43 endemic countries were sourced to define the spatial limits of P. falciparum transmission in 2010 and 22,212 P. falciparum parasite rate (PfPR) surveys were used in a model-based geostatistical (MBG) prediction to create a continuous contemporary surface of malaria endemicity within these limits. A suite of transmission models were developed that link PfPR to PfEIR and PfR and these were fitted to field data. These models were combined with the PfPR map to create new global predictions of PfEIR and PfR. All output maps included measured uncertainty.
Results:
An estimated 1.13 and 1.44 billion people worldwide were at risk of unstable and stable P. falciparum malaria, respectively. The majority of the endemic world was predicted with a median PfEIR of less than one and a median PfR
c of less than two. Values of either metric exceeding 10 were almost exclusive to Africa. The uncertainty described in both PfEIR and PfR was substantial in regions of intense transmission.
Conclusions:
The year 2010 has a particular significance as an evaluation milestone for malaria global health policy. The maps presented here contribute to a rational basis for control and elimination decisions and can serve as a baseline assessment as the global health community looks ahead to the next series of milestones targeted at 2015.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/378</link>
                <dc:creator>Peter Gething</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anand Patil</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carlos Guerra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Iqbal Elyazar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Geoffrey Johnston</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Tatem</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Hay</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2011, null:378</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-378</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>The paper represents a Herculean effort to provide an updated map of the global distribution of malaria, based on three key malariometric indices PfPR, PfEIR and PfRC and represents a unique contribution.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-10-378-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>378</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/352">
        <title>Poor quality vital anti-malarials in Africa - an urgent neglected public health priority</title>
        <description>Background:
Plasmodium falciparum malaria remains a major public health problem. A vital component of malaria control rests on the availability of good quality artemisinin-derivative based combination therapy (ACT) at the correct dose. However, there are increasing reports of poor quality anti-malarials in Africa.
Methods:
Seven collections of artemisinin derivative monotherapies, ACT and halofantrine anti-malarials of suspicious quality were collected in 2002/10 in eleven African countries and in Asia en route to Africa. Packaging, chemical composition (high performance liquid chromatography, direct ionization mass spectrometry, X-ray diffractometry, stable isotope analysis) and botanical investigations were performed.
Results:
Counterfeit artesunate containing chloroquine, counterfeit dihydroartemisinin (DHA) containing paracetamol (acetaminophen), counterfeit DHA-piperaquine containing sildenafil, counterfeit artemether-lumefantrine containing pyrimethamine, counterfeit halofantrine containing artemisinin, and substandard/counterfeit or degraded artesunate and artesunate+amodiaquine in eight countries are described. Pollen analysis was consistent with manufacture of counterfeits in eastern Asia. These data do not allow estimation of the frequency of poor quality anti-malarials in Africa.
Conclusions:
Criminals are producing diverse harmful anti-malarial counterfeits with important public health consequences. The presence of artesunate monotherapy, substandard and/or degraded and counterfeit medicines containing sub-therapeutic amounts of unexpected anti-malarials will engender drug resistance. With the threatening spread of artemisinin resistance to Africa, much greater investment is required to ensure the quality of ACTs and removal of artemisinin monotherapies. The International Health Regulations may need to be invoked to counter these serious public health problems.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/352</link>
                <dc:creator>Paul Newton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Green</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dallas Mildenhall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aline Plancon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henry Nettey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leonard Nyadong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dana Hostetler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Isabel Swamidoss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Glenn Harris</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kristen Powell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ans Timmermans</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abdinasir Amin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Opuni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Serge Barbereau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claude Faurant</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ray Soong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kevin Faure</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jonarthan Thevanayagam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Fernandes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Harparkash Kaur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brian Angus</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kasia Stepniewska</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philippe Guerin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Facundo Fernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2011, null:352</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-352</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>Criminals are producing diverse harmful anti-malarial counterfeits with important public health consequences. With the threatening spread of artemisinin resistance to Africa, much greater investment is required to ensure the quality of ACT and removal of artemisinin monotherapies.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-10-352-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>352</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/29">
        <title>The complexities of malaria disease manifestations with a focus on asymptomatic malaria</title>
        <description>Malaria is a serious parasitic disease in the developing world, causing high morbidity and mortality. The pathogenesis of malaria is complex, and the clinical presentation of disease ranges from severe and complicated, to mild and uncomplicated, to asymptomatic malaria. Despite a wealth of studies on the clinical severity of disease, asymptomatic malaria infections are still poorly understood. Asymptomatic malaria remains a challenge for malaria control programs as it significantly influences transmission dynamics. A thorough understanding of the interaction between hosts and parasites in the development of different clinical outcomes is required. In this review, the problems and obstacles to the study and control of asymptomatic malaria are discussed. The human and parasite factors associated with differential clinical outcomes are described and the management and treatment strategies for the control of the disease are outlined. Further, the crucial gaps in the knowledge of asymptomatic malaria that should be the focus of future research towards development of more effective malaria control strategies are highlighted.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/29</link>
                <dc:creator>Dolie Laishram</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Sutton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nutan Nanda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vijay Sharma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ranbir Sobti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Carlton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hema Joshi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2012, null:29</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-29</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>The pathogenesis of malaria is complex, and the clinical presentation of disease ranges from severe malaria, to mild and uncomplicated, to asymptomatic infections. Asymptomatic malaria remains a major challenge for malaria control programmes.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-11-29-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/28">
        <title>Strengthening the policy setting process for global malaria control and elimination</title>
        <description>The scale-up of malaria control efforts in recent years, coupled with major investments in malaria research, has produced impressive public health impact in a number of countries and has led to the development of new tools and strategies aimed at further consolidating malaria control goals.  As a result, there is a growing need for the malaria policy setting process to rapidly review increasing amounts of evidence.The World Health Organization Global Malaria Programme, in keeping with its mandate to set evidence-informed policies for malaria control, has convened the Malaria Policy Advisory Committee as a mechanism to increase the timeliness, transparency, independence and relevance of its recommendations to World Health Organization member states in relation to malaria control and elimination.The Malaria Policy Advisory Committee, composed of 15 world-renowned malaria experts, will meet in full twice a year, with the inaugural meeting scheduled for 31 January to 2 February 2012 in Geneva.  Policy recommendations, and the evidence to support them, will be published within two months of every meeting as part of an open access Malaria Journal thematic series.  This article is a prelude to that series and provides the global malaria community with the background and overview of the Committee and its terms of reference.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/28</link>
                <dc:creator>Bianca D'Souza</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Newman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2012, null:28</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-28</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>A new Thematic Series in Malaria Journal will, after each meeting of the Malaria Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC), a new WHO committee, publish its recommendations and the evidence to support them.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-11-28-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/11">
        <title>A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table</title>
        <description>Development and Phase 3 testing of the most advanced malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01, indicates that malaria vaccine R&amp;D is moving into a new phase. Field trials of several research malaria vaccines have also confirmed that it is possible to impact the host-parasite relationship through vaccine-induced immune responses to multiple antigenic targets using different platforms. Other approaches have been appropriately tested but turned out to be disappointing after clinical evaluation.As the malaria community considers the potential role of a first-generation malaria vaccine in malaria control efforts, it is an apposite time to carefully document terminated and ongoing malaria vaccine research projects so that lessons learned can be applied to increase the chances of success for second-generation malaria vaccines over the next 10 years.The most comprehensive resource of malaria vaccine projects is a spreadsheet compiled by WHO thanks to the input from funding agencies, sponsors and investigators worldwide. This spreadsheet, available from WHO&apos;s website, is known as &quot;the rainbow table&quot;. By summarizing the published and some unpublished information available for each project on the rainbow table, the most comprehensive review of malaria vaccine projects to be published in the last several years is provided below.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Lauren Schwartz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Graham Brown</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Blaise Genton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vasee Moorthy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2012, null:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-11</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>This review succeeds in its primary objective in presenting the most comprehensive review and, of necessity, is broad and goes into much more depth than might be expected. As such it complements the WHO spreadsheet, and is a valuable companion document.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-11-11-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/19">
        <title>Changes in malaria morbidity and mortality in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa (2001-2009): a retrospective study</title>
        <description>Background:
Malaria remains a serious epidemic threat in Mpumalanga Province. In order to appropriately target interventions to achieve substantial reduction in the burden of malaria and ultimately eliminate the disease, there is a need to track progress of malaria control efforts by assessing the time trends and evaluating the impact of current control interventions. This study aimed to assess the changes in the burden of malaria in Mpumalanga Province during the past eight malaria seasons (2001/02 to 2008/09) and whether indoor residual spraying (IRS) and climate variability had an effect on these changes.
Methods:
This is a descriptive retrospective study based on the analysis of secondary malaria surveillance data (cases and deaths) in Mpumalanga Province. Data were extracted from the Integrated Malaria Information System. Time series model (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) was used to assess the association between climate and malaria.
Results:
Within the study period, a total of 35,191 cases and 164 deaths due to malaria were notified in Mpumalanga Province. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of malaria from 385 in 2001/02 to 50 cases per 100,000 population in 2008/09 (P &lt; 0.005). The incidence and case fatality (CFR) rates for the study period were 134 cases per 100,000 and 0.54%, respectively. Mortality due to malaria was lower in infants and children (CFR &lt;0.5%) and higher in those &gt;65 years, with the mean CFR of 2.1% as compared to the national target of 0.5%. A distinct seasonal transmission pattern was found to be significantly related to changes in rainfall patterns (P = 0.007). A notable decline in malaria case notification was observed following apparent scale-up of IRS coverage from 2006/07 to 2008/09 malaria seasons.
Conclusions:
Mpumalanga Province has achieved the goal of reducing malaria morbidity and mortality by over 70%, partly as a result of scale-up of IRS intervention in combination with other control strategies. These results highlight the need to continue with IRS together with other control strategies until interruption in local malaria transmission is completely achieved. However, the goal to eliminate malaria as a public health problem requires efforts to be directed towards the control of imported malaria cases; development of strategies to interrupt local transmission; and maintaining high quality surveillance and reporting system.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Lindokuhle Ngomane</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christiaan de Jager</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2012, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-19</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>This paper provides an interesting descriptive review of nine years (eight malaria seasons) of routine malaria data from Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-11-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/21">
        <title>Integrated vector management for malaria control in Uganda:  knowledge, perceptions and policy development</title>
        <description>Background:
Integrated vector management (IVM) is increasingly being recommended as an option for sustainable malaria control.  However, many malaria-endemic countries lack a policy framework to guide and promote the approach. The objective of the study was to assess knowledge and perceptions in relation to current malaria vector control policy and IVM in Uganda, and to make recommendations for consideration during future development of a specific IVM policy.
Methods:
The study used a structured questionnaire to interview 34 individuals working at technical or policy-making levels in health, environment, agriculture and fisheries sectors. Specific questions on IVM focused on the following key elements of the approach: integration of chemical and non-chemical interventions of vector control; evidence-based decision making; inter-sectoral collaboration; capacity building; legislation; advocacy and community mobilization.
Results:
All participants were familiar with the term IVM and knew various conventional malaria vector control (MVC) methods.  Only 75% thought that Uganda had a MVC policy.  Eighty percent (80%) felt there was inter-sectoral collaboration towards IVM, but that it was poor due to financial constraints, difficulties in involving all possible sectors and political differences. The health, environment and agricultural sectors were cited as key areas requiring cooperation in order for IVM to succeed. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of participants responded that communities were actively being involved in MVC, while 48% felt that the use of research results for evidence-based decision making was inadequate or poor.  A majority of the participants felt that malaria research in Uganda was rarely used to facilitate policy changes.  Suggestions by participants for formulation of specific and effective IVM policy included: revising the MVC policy and IVM-related policies in other sectors into a single, unified IVM policy and, using legislation to enforce IVM in development projects.
Conclusion:
Integrated management of malaria vectors in Uganda remains an underdeveloped component of malaria control policy.  Cooperation between the health and other sectors needs strengthening and funding for MVC increased in order to develop and effectively implement an appropriate IVM policy. Continuous engagement of communities by government as well as monitoring and evaluation of vector control programmes will be crucial for sustaining IVM in the country.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Clifford Mutero</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dieter Schlodder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Narcis Kabatereine</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Randall Kramer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2012, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-21</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>This paper focuses on status of Integrated Vector Management in Uganda and is a good demonstration how surveys of individuals in different sectors can advance the development of IVM-based programmes in African countries.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-11-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/34">
        <title>Anti-malarial drugs: how effective are they against Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes?</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent renewed emphasis on the eradication of malaria has highlighted the need for more tools with which to achieve this ambitious goal. One high priority area is the need to determine the gametocytocidal activity of both currently used anti-malarial drugs and those in the development pipeline. However, testing the activity of compounds against Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes is technically challenging both in vivo and in vitro.
Methods:
Here the use of a simple robust assay to screen a panel of currently used and experimental anti-malarial drugs against mature P. falciparum gametocytes is described.
Results:
Eight of 44 compounds tested reduced gametocyte viability by at least 50% and three showed IC50 values in nM range.
Conclusions:
There is a need to identify new compounds with activity against late stage gametocytes and the information provided by this in vitro assay is a valuable first step, which can guide future clinical studies.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/34</link>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Peatey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Didier Leroy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donald Gardiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katharine Trenholme</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2012, null:34</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-34</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-11-34-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/20">
        <title>Importance of factors determining the effective lifetime of a mass, long-lasting, insecticidal net distribution: a sensitivity analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) reduce malaria transmission by protecting individuals from infectious bites, and by reducing mosquito survival. In recent years, millions of LLINs have been distributed across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Over time, LLINs decay physically and chemically and are destroyed, making repeated interventions necessary to prevent a resurgence of malaria. Because its effects on transmission are important (more so than the effects of individual protection), estimates of the lifetime of mass distribution rounds should be based on the effective length of epidemiological protection.
Methods:
Simulation models, parameterised using available field data, were used to analyse how the distribution&apos;s effective lifetime depends on the transmission setting and on LLIN characteristics. Factors considered were the pre-intervention transmission level, initial coverage, net attrition, and both physical and chemical decay. An ensemble of 14 stochastic individual-based model variants for malaria in humans was used, combined with a deterministic model for malaria in mosquitoes.
Results:
The effective lifetime was most sensitive to the pre-intervention transmission level, with a lifetime of almost 10 years at an entomological inoculation rate of two infectious bites per adult per annum (ibpapa), but of little more than 2 years at 256 ibpapa. The LLIN attrition rate and the insecticide decay rate were the next most important parameters. The lifetime was surprisingly insensitive to physical decay parameters, but this could change as physical integrity gains importance with the emergence and spread of pyrethroid resistance.
Conclusions:
The strong dependency of the effective lifetime on the pre-intervention transmission level indicated that the required distribution frequency may vary more with the local entomological situation than with LLIN quality or the characteristics of the distribution system. This highlights the need for malaria monitoring both before and during intervention programmes, particularly since there are likely to be strong variations between years and over short distances. The majority of SSA&apos;s population falls into exposure categories where the lifetime is relatively long, but because exposure estimates are highly uncertain, it is necessary to consider subsequent interventions before the end of the expected effective lifetime based on an imprecise transmission measure.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Olivier Briet</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Diggory Hardy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2012, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-20</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>Use of a pre-existing agent-based mathematical modelling platform for malaria to extend knowledge that is based on field studies on net and insecticide decay to model and estimate the epidemiological lifetimes of insecticide-treated bed nets under field conditions. A topic about which rather little is actually known.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-11-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/22">
        <title>Plate-based transfection and culturing technique for genetic manipulation of Plasmodium falciparum </title>
        <description>Genetic manipulation of malaria parasites remains an inefficient, time-consuming and resource-intensive process. Presented here is a set of methods for 96-well plate-based transfection and culture that improve the efficiency of genetic manipulation of Plasmodium falciparum. Compared to standard protocols plate-based transfection requires 20-fold less DNA, transient transfection efficiency achieved is approximately seven-fold higher, whilst stable transfection success rate is above 90%. Furthermore the utility of this set of protocols to generate a knockout of the PfRH3 pseudogene, screened by whole-cell PCR, is demonstrated. The methods and tools presented here will facilitate genome-scale genetic manipulation of P. falciparum.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Florence Caro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mathew Miller</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph DeRisi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2012, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-22</dc:identifier>
                                    <dc:description>Paper describing a series of semi-automated protocols that will facilitate transfection of P. falciparum.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2875-11-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

