<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Malaria Journal - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Malaria Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/58" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/44" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/69" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/57" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/62" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/56" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/7/S1/S3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/72" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/61" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/70" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/58">
        <title>Malaria indicator survey 2007, Ethiopia: coverage and use of major malaria prevention and control interventions</title>
        <description>Background:
In 2005, a nationwide survey estimated that 6.5% of households in Ethiopia owned an insecticide-treated net (ITN), 17% of households had been sprayed with insecticide, and 4% of children under five years of age with a fever were taking an anti-malarial drug. Similar to other sub-Saharan African countries scaling-up malaria interventions, the Government of Ethiopia set an ambitious national goal in 2005 to (i) provide 100% ITN coverage in malarious areas, with a mean of two ITNs per household; (ii) to scale-up indoor residual spraying of households with insecticide (IRS) to cover 30% of households targeted for IRS; and (iii) scale-up the provision of case management with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), particularly at the peripheral level.
Methods:
A nationally representative malaria indicator survey (MIS) was conducted in Ethiopia between September and December 2007 to determine parasite and anaemia prevalence in the population at risk and to assess coverage, use and access to scaled-up malaria prevention and control interventions. The survey used a two-stage random cluster sample of 7,621 households in 319 census enumeration areas. A total of 32,380 people participated in the survey. Data was collected using standardized Roll Back Malaria Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group MIS household and women&apos;s questionnaires, which were adapted to the local context.
Results:
Data presented is for households in malarious areas, which according to the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health are defined as being located &lt;2,000 m altitude. Of 5,083 surveyed households, 3,282 (65.6%) owned at least one ITN. In ITN-owning households, 53.2% of all persons had slept under an ITN the prior night, including 1,564/2,496 (60.1%) children &lt;5 years of age, 1,891/3,009 (60.9%) of women 15 - 49 years of age, and 166/266 (65.7%) of pregnant women. Overall, 906 (20.0%) households reported to have had IRS in the past 12 months. Of 747 children with reported fever in the two weeks preceding the survey, 131 (16.3%) sought medical attention within 24 hours. Of those with fever, 86 (11.9%) took an anti-malarial drug and 41 (4.7%) took it within 24 hours of fever onset. Among 7,167 surveyed individuals of all ages, parasitaemia as estimated by microscopy was 1.0% (95% CI 0.5 - 1.5), with 0.7% and 0.3% due to Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax, respectively. Moderate-severe anaemia (haemoglobin &lt;8 g/dl) was observed in 239/3,366 (6.6%, 95% CI 4.9-8.3) children &lt;5 years of age.
Conclusions:
Since mid-2005, the Ethiopian National Malaria Control Programme has considerably scaled-up its malaria prevention and control interventions, demonstrating the impact of strong political will and a committed partnership. The MIS showed, however, that besides sustaining and expanding malaria intervention coverage, efforts will have to be made to increase intervention access and use. With ongoing efforts to sustain and expand malaria intervention coverage, to increase intervention access and use, and with strong involvement of the community, Ethiopia expects to achieve its targets in terms of coverage and uptake of interventions in the coming years and move towards eliminating malaria.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/58</link>
                <dc:creator>Daddi Jima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Asefaw Getachew</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hana Bilak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Steketee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Emerson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Graves</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Teshome Gebre</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Reithinger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jimee Hwang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ethiopia Malaria Indicator Survey Working Group</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:58</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-58</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>58</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/44">
        <title>Control of pyrethroid and DDT-resistant Anopheles gambiae by application of indoor residual spraying or mosquito nets treated with a long-lasting organophosphate insecticide, chlorpyrifos-methyl
</title>
        <description>Background:
Scaling up of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) with support from the Global Fund and President&apos;s Malaria Initiative is providing increased opportunities for malaria control in Africa. The most cost-effective and longest-lasting residual insecticide DDT is also the most environmentally persistent. Alternative residual insecticides exist, but are too short-lived or too expensive to sustain. Dow Agrosciences have developed a microencapsulated formulation (CS) of the organophosphate chlorpyrifos methyl as a cost-effective, long-lasting alternative to DDT.
Methods:
Chlorpyrifos methyl CS was tested as an IRS or ITN treatment in experimental huts in an area of Benin where Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasiactus are resistant to pyrethroids, but susceptible to organophosphates. Efficacy and residual activity was compared to that of DDT and the pyrethroid lambdacyalothrin.
Results:
IRS with chlorpyrifos methyl killed 95% of An. gambiae that entered the hut as compared to 31% with lambdacyhalothrin and 50% with DDT. Control of Cx. quinquefasciatus showed a similar trend; although the level of mortality with chlorpyrifos methyl was lower (66%) it was still much higher than for DDT (14%) or pyrethroid (15%) treatments. Nets impregnated with lambdacyhalothrin were compromized by resistance, killing only 30% of An. gambiae and 8% of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Nets impregnated with chlorpyrifos methyl killed more (45% of An gambiae and 15% of Cx. quinquefasciatus), but its activity on netting was of short duration. Contact bioassays on the sprayed cement-sand walls over the nine months of monitoring showed no loss of activity of chlorpyrifos methyl, whereas lambdacyhalothrin and DDT lost activity within a few months of spraying.
Conclusion:
As an IRS treatment against pyrethroid resistant mosquitoes chlorpyrifos methyl CS outperformed DDT and lambdacyhalothrin. In IRS campaigns, chlorpyrifos methyl CS should show higher, more-sustained levels of malaria transmission control than conventional formulations of DDT or pyrethroids. The remarkable residual activity indicates that cost-effective alternatives to DDT are feasible through modern formulation technology.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/44</link>
                <dc:creator>Raphael N'Guessan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pelagie Boko</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abibathou Odjo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Chabi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Akogbeto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Rowland</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:44</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-44</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/69">
        <title>Distribution of the main malaria vectors in Kenya</title>
        <description>Background:
A detailed knowledge of the distribution of the main Anopheles malaria vectors in Kenya should guide national vector control strategies. However, contemporary spatial distributions of the locally dominant Anopheles vectors including Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis, Anopheles merus, Anopheles funestus, Anopheles pharoensis and Anopheles nili are lacking. The methods and approaches used to assembling contemporary available data on the present distribution of the dominant malaria vectors in Kenya are presented here.MethodPrimary empirical data from published and unpublished sources were identified for the period 1990 to 2009. Details recorded for each source included the first author, year of publication, report type, survey location name, month and year of survey, the main Anopheles species reported as present and the sampling and identification methods used. Survey locations were geo-positioned using national digital place name archives and on-line geo-referencing resources. The geo-located species-presence data were displayed and described administratively, using first-level administrative units (province), and biologically based on the predicted spatial margins of Plasmodium falciparum transmission intensity in Kenya for the year 2009. Each geo-located survey site was assigned an urban or rural classification and attributed an altitude value.
Results:
A total of 498 spatially unique descriptions of Anopheles vector species across Kenya sampled between 1990 and 2009 were identified, 53% were obtained from published sources and further communications with authors. More than half (54%) of the sites surveyed were investigated since 2005. A total of 174 sites reported the presence of An. gambiae complex without identification of sibling species. Anopheles arabiensis and An. funestus were the most widely reported at 244 and 265 spatially unique sites respectively with the former showing the most ubiquitous distribution nationally. Anopheles gambiae, An. arabiensis, An. funestus and An. pharoensis were reported at sites located in all the transmission intensity classes with more reports of An. gambiae in the highest transmission intensity areas than the very low transmission areas.
Conclusion:
A contemporary, spatially defined database of the main malaria vectors in Kenya provides a baseline for future compilations of data and helps identify areas where information is currently lacking. The data collated here are published alongside this paper where it may help guide future sampling location decisions, help with the planning of vector control suites nationally and encourage broader research inquiry into vector species niche modelling.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/69</link>
                <dc:creator>Robi Okara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marianne Sinka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Noboru Minakawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles Mbogo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Hay</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Snow</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:69</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-69</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/57">
        <title>Rapid and effective malaria control in Cambodia through mass administration of artemisinin-piperaquine</title>
        <description>Background:
Previous efforts to eradicate malaria parasites, particularly Plasmodium falciparum, have failed in part due to the emergence of drug resistant parasites and mosquitoes resistant to insecticides. Using an artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) that kills parasites quickly, a strategy was designed to eliminate the source of transmission by mass treatment of human populations in malaria-endemic areas Cambodia.
Methods:
A combination drug of artemisinin and piperaquine given with low doses of primaquine was used to eliminate all stages of parasites from human carriers.
Results:
In a pilot study, mass administration of artemisinin-piperaquine (two tablets of 62.5 mg artemisinin and 375 mg piperaquine for adults aged &#8805;16 years at 0 and 24 hrs; 1.5 tablet for children aged 11-15 years; and one tablet for children aged 6-10 years) and primaquine (9 mg for adults, at 10 day intervals for 6 months) was carried out in 17 villages (3,653 individuals). Parasite rates were dramatically reduced from 52.3% to 2.6% after three years. The P. falciparum rate in children decreased from 37.0% to 1.4%, reaching 0% in eight of 17 villages. In a second field study, that included one additional mass treatment of artemisinin-piperaquine, the P. falciparum rate in children was reduced from 20.8% to 0% within six months. No major adverse effects were observed.
Conclusions:
Mass administration of artemisinin-piperaquine and low doses of primaquine can be an effective, safe, and affordable strategy for efficiently eliminating malaria parasites in human carriers and interrupting parasite transmission. This study provides important information for future strategies for the eradication of malaria.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/57</link>
                <dc:creator>Jianping Song</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Duong Socheat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bo Tan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Prak Dara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Changsheng Deng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sreng Sokunthea</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Suon Seila</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fengzhen Ou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Huaxiang Jian</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guoqiao Li</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:57</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-57</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/62">
        <title>Anopheles gambiae: historical population decline associated with regional distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets in western Nyanza Province, Kenya

</title>
        <description>Background:
High coverage of insecticide-treated bed nets in Asembo and low coverage in Seme, two adjacent communities in western Nyanza Province, Kenya; followed by expanded coverage of bed nets in Seme, as the Kenya national malaria programme rolled out; provided a natural experiment for quantification of changes in relative abundance of two primary malaria vectors in this holoendemic region. Both belong to the Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) species complex, namely A. gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) and Anopheles arabiensis. Historically, the former species was proportionately dominant in indoor resting collections of females.
Methods:
Data of the relative abundance of adult A. gambiae s.s. and A. arabiensis sampled from inside houses were obtained from the literature from 1970 to 2002 for sites west of Kisumu, Kenya, to the region of Asembo ca. 50 km from the city. A sampling transect was established from Asembo (where bed net use was high due to presence of a managed bed net distribution programme) eastward to Seme, where no bed net programme was in place. Adults of A. gambiae s.l. were sampled from inside houses along the transect from 2003 to 2009, as were larvae from nearby aquatic habitats, providing data over a nearly 40 year period of the relative abundance of the two species. Relative proportions of A. gambiae s.s. and A. arabiensis were determined for each stage by identifying species by the polymerase chain reaction method. Household bed net ownership was measured with surveys during mosquito collections. Data of blood host choice, parity rate, and infection rate for Plasmodium falciparum in A. gambiae s.s. and A. arabiensis were obtained for a sample from Asembo and Seme from 2005.
Results:
Anopheles gambiae s.s. adult females from indoor collections predominated from 1970 to 1998 (ca. 85%). Beginning in 1999, A. gambiae s.s decreased proportionately relative to A. arabiensis, then precipitously declined to rarity coincident with increased bed net ownership as national bed net distribution programmes commenced in 2004 and 2006. By 2009, A. gambiae s.s. comprised proportionately ca. 1% of indoor collections and A. arabiensis 99%. In Seme compared to Asembo in 2003, proportionately more larvae were A. gambiae s.s., larval density was higher, and more larval habitats were occupied. As bed net use rose in Seme, the proportion of A. gambiae larvae declined as well. These trends continued to 2009. Parity and malaria infection rates were lower in both species in Asembo (high bed net use) compared to Seme (low bed net use), but host choice did not vary within species in both communities (predominantly cattle for A. arabiensis, humans for A. gambiae s.s.).
Conclusions:
A marked decline of the A. gambiae s.s. population occurred as household ownership of bed nets rose in a region of western Kenya over a 10 year period. The increased bed net coverage likely caused a mass effect on the composition of the A. gambiae s.l. species complex, resulting in the observed proportionate increase in A. arabiensis compared to its closely related sibling species, A. gambiae s.s. These observations are important in evaluating the process of regional malaria elimination, which requires sustained vector control as a primary intervention.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/62</link>
                <dc:creator>M Nabie Bayoh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Derrick Mathias</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maurice Odiere</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francis Mutuku</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luna Kamau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Gimnig</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Vulule</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Hawley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Hamel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edward Walker</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:62</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-62</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>62</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/56">
        <title>Efficacy of non-artemisinin- and artemisinin-based combination therapies for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cameroon</title>
        <description>Background:
The use of drug combinations, including non-artemisinin-based and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), is a novel strategy that enhances therapeutic efficacy and delays the emergence of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Its use is strongly recommended in most sub-Saharan African countries, namely Cameroon, where resistance to chloroquine is widespread and antifolate resistance is emerging.
Methods:
Studies were conducted in Cameroonian children with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria according to the standard World Health Organization protocol at four sentinel sites between 2003 and 2007. A total of 1,401 children were enrolled, of whom 1,337 were assigned to randomized studies and 64 were included in a single non-randomized study. The proportions of adequate clinical and parasitological response (PCR-uncorrected on day 14 and PCR-corrected on day 28) were the primary endpoints to evaluate treatment efficacy on day 14 and day 28. The relative effectiveness of drug combinations was compared by a multi-treatment Bayesian random-effect meta-analysis.FindingsThe results based on the meta-analysis suggested that artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) is as effective as other drugs (artesunate-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine [AS-SP], artesunate-chlorproguanil-dapsone [AS-CD], artesunate-mefloquine [AS-MQ], dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine [DH-PP], artemether-lumefantrine [AM-LM], amodiaquine, and amodiaquine-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine [AQ-SP]). AM-LM appeared to be the most effective with no treatment failure due to recrudescence, closely followed by DH-PP.
Conclusion:
Although AM-LM requires six doses, rather than three doses for other artemisinin-based combinations, it has potential advantages over other forms of ACT. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerance of these combinations in different epidemiological context.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/56</link>
                <dc:creator>Solange Whegang Youdom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachida Tahar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vincent Foumane Ngane</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georges Soula</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henri Gwet</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean-Christophe Thalabard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leonardo Basco</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:56</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-56</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/7/S1/S3">
        <title>Global warming and malaria: knowing the horse before hitching the cart</title>
        <description>Speculations on the potential impact of climate change on human health frequently focus on malaria. Predictions are common that in the coming decades, tens &#8211; even hundreds &#8211; of millions more cases will occur in regions where the disease is already present, and that transmission will extend to higher latitudes and altitudes. Such predictions, sometimes supported by simple models, are persuasive because they are intuitive, but they sidestep factors that are key to the transmission and epidemiology of the disease: the ecology and behaviour of both humans and vectors, and the immunity of the human population. A holistic view of the natural history of the disease, in the context of these factors and in the precise setting where it is transmitted, is the only valid starting point for assessing the likely significance of future changes in climate.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/7/S1/S3</link>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2008, 7:S3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-S1-S3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>S3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/72">
        <title>Comparative detection of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum DNA in saliva and urine samples from symptomatic malaria patients in a low endemic area</title>
        <description>Background:
Definite diagnosis of malaria relies on microscopy detection of blood stages of parasites in peripheral blood and requires blood sample collection. The nested PCR method has shown to be more sensitive and superior to microscopy in detecting co-infections of Plasmodium species in circulation while Plasmodium falciparum DNA can be identified in urine and saliva specimens of patients, albeit at a lower sensitivity.
Methods:
Matched blood, saliva and urine samples were collected from 100 microscopy-positive and 20 microscopy-negative febrile patients who attended a malaria clinic in Tak Province, northwestern Thailand for nested PCR analysis targeting the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene of human malaria. Both P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax have been known to circulate at a comparable rate in the study area.
Results:
Comparing with microscopy results, nested PCR of saliva samples had a sensitivity of 74.1% for P. falciparum detection and 84% for P. vivax detection while 44.4% and 34.0% of the corresponding values were observed for urine samples. Both nested PCR results of saliva and urine samples had a specificity of 100% for identification of P. falciparum and P. vivax when compared with nested PCR results from blood. Co-infections of both species were found in four, 26 and 8 patients by microscopy and nested PCR of blood and saliva samples, respectively. Although the positive rates of nested PCR of saliva samples for P. falciparum increased with parasite density, no tendency occurred in results from nested PCR of saliva samples for P. vivax as well as those of urine samples.
Conclusions:
Saliva and urine samples could be alternative noninvasive sources of DNA for molecular detection of both P. falciparum and P. vivax. Further improvement of the detection method will offer an opportunity to use these samples for diagnosis of malaria.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/72</link>
                <dc:creator>Pattakorn Buppan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chaturong Putaporntip</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Urassaya Pattanawong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sunee Seethamchai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Somchai Jongwutiwes</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:72</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-72</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/61">
        <title>Community response to artemisinin-based combination therapy for childhood malaria: a case study from Dar es Salaam, Tanzania</title>
        <description>Background:
New malaria treatment guidelines in Tanzania have led to the large-scale deployment of artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem&#174;), popularly known as ALu or dawa mseto. Very little is known about how people in malaria endemic areas interpret policy makers&apos; decision to replace existing anti-malarials, such as sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) with &quot;new&quot; treatment regimens, such as ALu or other formulations of ACT. This study was conducted to examine community level understandings and interpretations of ALu&apos;s efficacy and side-effects. The paper specifically examines the perceived efficacy of ALu as articulated by the mothers of young children diagnosed with malaria and prescribed ALu.
Methods:
Participant observation, six focus group discussions in two large villages, followed by interviews with a random sample of 110 mothers of children less than five years of age, who were diagnosed with malaria and prescribed ALu. Additionally, observations were conducted in two village dispensaries involving interactions between mothers/caretakers and health care providers.
Results:
While more than two-thirds of the mothers had an overall negative disposition toward SP, 97.5% of them spoke favourably about ALu, emphasizing it&apos;s ability to help their children to rapidly recover from malaria, without undesirable side-effects. 62.5% of the mothers reported that they were spending less money dealing with malaria than previously when their child was treated with SP. 88% of the mothers had waited for 48 hours or more after the onset of fever before taking their child to the dispensary. Mothers&apos; knowledge and reporting of ALu&apos;s dosage was, in many cases, inconsistent with the recommended dosage schedule for children.
Conclusion:
Deployment of ALu has significantly changed community level perceptions of anti-malarial treatment. However, mothers continue to delay seeking care before accessing ALu, limiting the impact of highly subsidized rollout of the drug. Implementation of ACT-based treatment guidelines must be complemented with educational campaigns to insure that mothers seek prompt help for their children within 24 hours of the onset of fever. Improved communication between health care providers and mothers of sick children can facilitate better adherence to ALu&apos;s recommended dosage. Community level interpretations of anti-malarials are multifaceted; integrating knowledge of local beliefs and practices surrounding consumption of anti-malarials into programmatic goals can help to significantly improve malaria control interventions.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/61</link>
                <dc:creator>Vinay Kamat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Nyato</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:61</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-61</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>61</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/70">
        <title>Assessing the future threat from vivax malaria in the United Kingdom using two markedly different modelling approaches

</title>
        <description>Background:
The world is facing an increased threat from new and emerging diseases, and there is concern that climate change will expand areas suitable for transmission of vector borne diseases. The likelihood of vivax malaria returning to the UK was explored using two markedly different modelling approaches. First, a simple temperature-dependent, process-based model of malaria growth transmitted by Anopheles atroparvus, the historical vector of malaria in the UK. Second, a statistical model using logistic-regression was used to predict historical malaria incidence between 1917 and 1918 in the UK, based on environmental and demographic data. Using findings from these models and saltmarsh distributions, future risk maps for malaria in the UK were produced based on UKCIP02 climate change scenarios.
Results:
The process-based model of climate suitability showed good correspondence with historical records of malaria cases. An analysis of the statistical models showed that mean temperature of the warmest month of the year was the major factor explaining the distribution of malaria, further supporting the use of the temperature-driven processed-based model. The risk maps indicate that large areas of central and southern England could support malaria transmission today and could increase in extent in the future. Confidence in these predictions is increased by the concordance between the processed-based and statistical models.
Conclusion:
Although the future climate in the UK is favourable for the transmission of vivax malaria, the future risk of locally transmitted malaria is considered low because of low vector biting rates and the low probability of vectors feeding on a malaria-infected person.</description>
        <link>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/9/1/70</link>
                <dc:creator>Steven Lindsay</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Hole</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Hutchinson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shane Richards</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Willis</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Malaria Journal 2010, 9:70</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-70</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Malaria Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2875</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>70</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
