<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1475-2875-7-71</ui>
   <ji>1475-2875</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Methodology</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Determination of nitric oxide metabolites, nitrate and nitrite, in <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>mosquito midgut and haemolymph by anion exchange high-performance liquid chromatography: plausible mechanism of refractoriness</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1" ca="yes">
               <snm>Sharma</snm>
               <fnm>Arun</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>sharmaaru20032003@yahoo.co.in</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Raghavendra</snm>
               <fnm>Kamaraju</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>kamarajur2000@yahoo.com</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Adak</snm>
               <fnm>Tridibesh</fnm>
               <insr iid="I3"/>
               <email>adak@mrcindia.org</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Dash</snm>
               <mi>P</mi>
               <fnm>Aditya</fnm>
               <insr iid="I4"/>
               <email>dashap@icmr.org.in</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Protein Biochemistry Laboratory, National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), 22 Sham Nath Marg, Delhi- 110 054, India</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Molecular Entomology Laboratory, National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR) 22 Sham Nath Marg, Delhi- 110 054, India</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I3">
               <p>Entomology Laboratory, National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR) 2, Nanak Enclave, Delhi-110 009, India</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I4">
               <p>National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), 22 Sham Nath Marg, Delhi- 110 054, India</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Malaria Journal</source>
         <issn>1475-2875</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>7</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>71</fpage>
         <url>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/7/1/71</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">18442373</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-7-71</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>31</day>
               <month>12</month>
               <year>2007</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>28</day>
               <month>4</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>28</day>
               <month>4</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2008</year>
         <collab>Sharma et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Background</p>
               </st>
               <p>The diverse physiological and pathological role of nitric oxide in innate immune defenses against many intra and extracellular pathogens, have led to the development of various methods for determining nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. NO metabolites, nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) are produced by the action of an inducible <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>NO synthase (AcNOS) in mosquito mid-guts and may be central to anti-parasitic arsenal of these mosquitoes.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Method</p>
               </st>
               <p>While exploring a plausible mechanism of refractoriness based on nitric oxide synthase physiology among the sibling species of <it>An. culicifacies</it>, a sensitive, specific and cost effective high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed, which is not influenced by the presence of biogenic amines, for the determination of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>from mosquito mid-guts and haemolymph.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>This method is based on extraction, efficiency, assay reproducibility and contaminant minimization. It entails de-proteinization by centrifugal ultra filtration through ultracel 3 K filter and analysis by high performance anion exchange liquid chromatography (Sphereclone, 5 &#956; SAX column) with UV detection at 214 nm. The lower detection limit of the assay procedure is 50 pmoles in all midgut and haemolymph samples. Retention times for NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in standards and in mid-gut samples were 3.42 and 4.53 min. respectively. Assay linearity for standards ranged between 50 n<it>M </it>and 1 m<it>M</it>. Recoveries of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>from spiked samples (1&#8211;100 &#956;<it>M</it>) and from the extracted standards (1&#8211;100 &#956;<it>M</it>) were calculated to be 100%. Intra-assay and inter assay variations and relative standard deviations (RSDs) for NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in spiked and un-spiked midgut samples were 5.7% or less. Increased levels NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in midguts and haemolymph of <it>An. culicifacies </it>sibling species B in comparison to species A reflect towards a mechanism of refractoriness based on AcNOS physiology.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusion</p>
               </st>
               <p>HPLC is a sensitive and accurate technique for identification and quantifying pmole levels of NO metabolites in mosquito midguts and haemolymph samples that can be useful for clinical investigations of NO biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology in various biological samples.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>Potential control efforts for malaria mainly include vaccine development, vector control and development of new anti-malarial drugs <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. Vector control has become increasingly difficult due to mosquito resistance to insecticides <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> and efforts to replace natural vectors with mosquitoes that do not support parasite development are under study and may contribute to malaria control in long term <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>. Advances in the molecular genetic manipulations of insect species have led to speculation that malaria could be controlled through genetic alterations of <it>Anopheline </it>mosquitoes rendered refractory to <it>Plasmodium </it>growth and differentiation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>. While assessing natural susceptibility of <it>Anopheles culicifacies sensu lato </it>from different geographical areas against <it>Plasmodium vivax </it>infection, an iso-female line was found, which was found to be 100% refractory to <it>Plasmodium vivax </it>infection. This iso-female line was later identified as <it>An. culicifacies </it>species B <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>The mosquito midgut is the first major site of interaction between the parasite and the mosquito. Failure of the parasite to negotiate this environment can be a barrier for development and is likely the main cause of mosquito refractoriness. The sporogonic development of <it>Plasmodium</it>, from gamete to oocyst formation, takes place in the lumen and epithelium of the mosquito midgut <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp> and some mosquito-specific factors probably determine the outcome of this sporogonic development <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>. It has long been recognized that mosquitoes possess highly effective innate defense mechanisms of both cellular and humoral nature <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. Such responses may be important for the vectorial capacity of the mosquito and understanding of parasite-vector interactions and mechanism of refractoriness. It was also shown by Luckart <it>et al </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp> that a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) gene in <it>Anopheles stephensi </it>is transcriptionally activated at a modest level after malaria infection to limit the development of parasites <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>. Induction of <it>AcNOS (An. culicifacies </it>NOS) expression is proportional to the intensity of parasite infection and is detectable in the midgut by 6 h post infection <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>NO metabolites, nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) are produced by the action of an inducible <it>An. culicifacies </it>NO synthase (AcNOS) in mosquito midguts and may be central to anti-parasitic arsenal of these mosquitoes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>. Measurements of nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) in midguts and haemolymph of mosquitoes are proposed indices to reflect accurately cellular nitric oxide production and represents a considerable analytical challenge. The diverse physiological and pathological roles of nitric oxide in innate immune defenses against many intra and extracellular pathogens, have led to the development of various methods for determining nitric oxide (NO) synthesis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. Because NO is a free radical molecule released by cells in picomolar to nanomolar ranges and has a very short life, a direct measurement of it is difficult <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. Measurement of nitrite and nitrate, the stable products of NO oxidation, has often been performed to assess NO synthesis in various biological systems <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. A number of ion exchange and reversed phase ion paired HPLC methods have been developed for measuring nitrite and nitrate in biological systems with detection by either UV-VIS absorbance <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp> or fluorescence <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp> or chemiluminiscence <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp> or conductivity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. Most HPLC methods require several purification steps to remove interfering substances such as chloride and biogenic amines and therefore, the results may vary considerably <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>. Thus, quantification of pico-mole levels of nitrite and nitrate in biological samples is still a challenge.</p>
         <p>The aim of the present study was to determine midgut and haemolymph levels of nitrite and nitrate in <it>An. culicifacies </it>refractory species B and compares it with sensitive species A over the course of time to evaluate the mechanism of refractoriness and the performance of a novel HPLC method. The HPLC method offers high sensitivity and specificity as well as easy automation for the determination of pico-mole levels of nitrite and nitrate in mosquito midguts and haemolymph. This procedure may also be suitable for routine determination of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in various other biological fluids/samples.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Materials</p>
            </st>
            <p>HPLC-grade water was purchased from Thomas Baker (India) and was used for the preparation of the mobile phase solution. Double distilled and deionised (DD-water) was used for preparing other solutions. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>), Potassium phosphate (K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>), Potassium nitrite (KNO<sub>2</sub>), Potassium nitrate (KNO<sub>3</sub>) was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Intermediate and working standard solutions covered the concentration range reported and were prepared by diluting the stock standard solutions with water. All solutions were stored at 4&#176;C.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Mosquito rearing and blood-feeding</p>
            </st>
            <p>Indoor-resting wild <it>An. culicifacies s.l</it>. adult females were collected from human dwellings by hand catch method and transported to laboratory. The iso-female progenies obtained from wild female mosquitoes were held separately in 30 &#215; 30 &#215; 30 cms cloth cages and kept in the insectary maintained at temperature 27 &#177; 2&#176;C and 75 &#177; 5% relative humidity (RH) with photoperiod of 14 hr light and 10 hr dark. Adult mosquitoes were offered water soaked raisins and 1% glucose soaked cotton pads as a source of energy. Few adult female mosquitoes from each F<sub>1 </sub>iso-female progeny were identified to sibling species using species-specific diagnostic inversion genotypes as described by Subbarao et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp>. At least 50 to 60 iso-female lines from a particular geographical locality showing species-specific diagnostic inversion genotype of species B were pooled together to establish a strain. This iso-female line was later identified as sibling species B and designated as <it>P. vivax </it>refractory strain. The susceptibility of all these species B strains was assessed in the laboratory against <it>P. vivax</it>, the predominant human malaria parasite species in India.</p>
            <p>In each feeding experiment, cohorts of 50 mosquitoes from each of species A and species B strains starved for 12&#8211;16 hours were used <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>. About 2&#8211;3 ml of <it>P. vivax </it>infected blood was drawn from consenting volunteer patient (aged &#8805; 16 yrs) having mature <it>P. vivax </it>gametocytes density ranging between 0.05 to 0.5% following human use protocol approved by the Human Ethical Committee of the Centre as described by earlier <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. All <it>P.vivax </it>positive patients were treated with 600 mg chloroquine once on day '0' and 15 mg of primaquine for five consecutive days (adult dose) following national drug policy of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), Government of India.</p>
            <p>The mosquitoes were fed on <it>P. vivax</it>-infected blood through a membrane feeding system, essentially following the method as described by Adak <it>et al </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. In all feeding experiments, laboratory reared <it>An. stephensi</it>, which are highly susceptible to <it>P. vivax </it>infection, were also fed parallely along with all species A and species B strains on the same blood sample, to assess the comparative infectiousness to mosquitoes. The controls and infected mosquitoes were fed at the same time to minimize the variations in mosquitoes colonies sampled at different times.</p>
            <p>After 30 minutes of feeding, unfed and partially fed mosquitoes from each cohort were removed, only fully engorged mosquitoes were kept securely in 30 &#215; 30 &#215; 30 cms cloth cages in the insectary for subsequent examination of sporogonic development. Minimum of 50% of the surviving <it>An. culicifacies </it>and <it>An. stephensi </it>mosquitoes from each feeding experiment, fed on the same blood isolate were dissected on day '7' and '9&#8211;10' and '14&#8211;15' in PBSI (phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mM EDTA and 1 mg/ml Pefabloc<sup>&#174;</sup>). Subsequently, midguts and haemolymph were collected for further analysis.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Midgut and haemolymph preparation</p>
            </st>
            <p>All dissections were performed on ice, in PBSI. Midguts and haemolymph samples were simultaneously isolated from individually dissected mosquitoes and were pooled (50 samples) from sugar fed (0 day) and uninfected and infected blood fed mosquitoes (7, 9&#8211;10, and 14 days). The controls and infected mosquitoes were fed at the same time to minimize the variations in mosquitoes colonies sampled at different times.</p>
            <p>Midguts were dissected from sugar-fed female (0-day) mosquitoes. Midguts from blood-fed mosquitoes were opened by a longitudinal incision and haemolymph was directly collected and pooled. Midguts were thoroughly rinsed three times in ice-cold PBSI to remove all traces of peritrophic matrix and gut contents. Haemolymph and dissected mid-guts were stored at -80&#176;C until processing.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Samples extraction</p>
            </st>
            <p>Mosquito midguts and haemolymph were sonicated and diluted with equal volume of HEPES buffer (10 m<it>M </it>HEPES, 140 m<it>M </it>NaCl, 2.7 m<it>M </it>KCl, 1 m<it>M </it>CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 1 m<it>M </it>MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 5 m<it>M </it>glucose, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, p<it>H </it>7.4) and centrifuged at 1,500 g. Supernatants were obtained from washed midgut and haemolymph samples in HEPES buffer for analysis of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>and normalized for their protein content between individual groups. Prior to analysis, samples (200 &#956;l) were centrifuged for 30 min through a Microsep (3.5 ml capacity) 3 K micro concentrator filters (Ultracel YM-3, Millipore Co.) at 11,000 g and 3,000 g respectively to remove all the proteins. Filters had been pre-washed with deionized water with centrifugation and disposal of the wastes.</p>
            <p>Aliquots of each individually filtered sample extracts were spiked with 25 &#956;M aqueous KNO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>/KNO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>standards as at this concentration the recovery is 100% (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). 20 &#956;l of spiked sample extracts were directly injected onto the chromatograph. Sample concentrations were corrected for silica column NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>/NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>contamination by subtracting the values obtained with water which has also been subjected to extraction procedure.</p>
            <tbl id="T1">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Recoveries of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in extracted KNO<sub>2</sub>/KNO<sub>3 </sub>standards (Mean &#177; SD, n = 8)</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="3">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Concentration</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>Recovery (%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup></p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="3">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>48 nM</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>90.7 &#177; 1.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>28.3 &#177; 3.4</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>97 nM</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>94.5 &#177; 6.2</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>54.8 &#177; 4.3</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>195 nM</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>94.7 &#177; 5.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>87.8 &#177; 5.1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>390 nM</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>93.4 &#177; 4.0</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>80.2 &#177; 1.5</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>780 nM</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>93.6 &#177; 1.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>93.7 &#177; 4.5</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.56 &#956;M</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>93.7 &#177; 2.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>87.9 &#177; 3.9</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>3.12 &#956;M</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>91.8 &#177; 1.6</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>95.2 &#177; 2.9</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>6.25 &#956;M</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>98.5 &#177; 2.4</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>98.5 &#177; 3.1</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>12.5 &#956;M</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>97.1 &#177; 1.8</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>94.8 &#177; 1.9</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>25 &#956;M</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>99 &#177; 5.4</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>100.5 &#177; 3.2</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>50 &#956;M</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>100 &#177; 5.8</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>97.3 &#177; 2.9</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>100 &#956;M</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>97.1 &#177; 2.4</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>99.2 &#177; 4.9</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
            </tbl>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Instrument</p>
            </st>
            <p>The chromatograph comprised a Shimadzu Sil-10AD sample injector port with a 100 &#956;l sample loop, a Shimadzu LC-10AT liquid chromatography pump, a UV-VIS detector SPD10 AV and a Shimadzu LC-workstation (all instruments Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The column (250 &#215; 4.6 mm, Sphereclone 5 &#956; SAX, Phenomenex Co. USA), was an anion exchanger (SEM based on silica). The mobile phase was pumped at a rate of 1.5 ml/min and consisted of 5 m<it>M </it>K<sub>2 </sub>HPO<sub>4 </sub>and 25 MM KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, <it>pH </it>3.0. The effluent was monitored at 214 nm. The injection volume was 20 &#956;l and the column and samples were kept at 35 &#177; 5&#176;C and 4 &#177; 5&#176;C, respectively.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Calculation of sample NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>concentrations</p>
            </st>
            <p>Sample NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>concentrations were calculated by reference to KNO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>/KNO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>standard mixtures. Chromatogram peak areas in preference to peak heights were used in these calculations as these were found to yield more reproducible results. These were measured manually with peak "skimming" being employed where necessary. Where appropriate sample concentrations were corrected for background contamination with NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in water and buffer solutions.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Assay validation</p>
            </st>
            <p>Several criteria associated with the assay validation were undertaken according to ICH guidelines <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp> so as to define the method's selectivity, linearity, and lower limit of detection, lower limit of quantitation, precision, accuracy and recovery from biological samples.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Statistical analysis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Data are expressed as mean and standard error of the mean (n = 3) and analysed using 2-way ANOVA (Friedman test). Probability values of <it>p </it>&lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Typical chromatographic traces of nitrite and nitrate obtained after extraction and direct injection from the standard, mosquito gut samples and mosquito haemolymph samples are presented in Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>. The limit of quantification in midguts and haemolymph samples was defined as the lowest concentration of nitrite and nitrate resulting in a signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1. The lowest detection limit was 0.1 &#956;mole/l. The retention times for NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in standard solutions were (mean &#177; SD) 3.400 and 4.533 min. respectively (n = 8).</p>
         <fig id="F1">
            <title>
               <p>Figure 1</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>HPLC analysis of nitrite and nitrate</p>
            </caption>
            <text>
               <p><b>HPLC analysis of nitrite and nitrate</b>. Chromatograms of an aqueous standard containing 25 &#956;M nitrite and nitrate (A) and washed and spiked <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>midguts obtained under control conditions (B) and <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>haemolymph.</p>
            </text>
            <graphic file="1475-2875-7-71-1"/>
         </fig>
         <p>In mosquito midgut the retention times (n = 8) were 3.400 and 4.525 min. respectively and haemolymph samples the retention times were found to be 3.433 and 4.525 min (Fig. <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). Chromatogram peak identities for samples extracts were confirmed in spiking experiments in which known quantities of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>standards were added.</p>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Recovery</p>
            </st>
            <p>Recovery is expressed as the amount of analyte found as a percentage to the theoretical amount thought to be present in the medium. All samples from mosquitoes were spiked with 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10, 25, 50 and 100 &#956;mole/l of each nitrite and nitrate. Ten aliquots of each samples were chromatographed as described in section Chromatography and the resulting peak areas were compared with the peak areas that resulting from the aqueous solutions at the same concentrations (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). The recovery amounts from mosquito midguts were 94.4 &#177; 4.4, 98.2+6.6, 95.2 &#177; 2.9, 98.5 &#177; 3.1, and 99.8 &#177; 1.9 by coefficients of variations (C.V.) 5.9%, 5.4%, 6.0%, 4.8% and 5.1% for determination of nitrite and nitrate (&#956;mole/l), respectively.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Intra-day reproducibility</p>
            </st>
            <p>Aliquots of midguts containing 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 25, 50, and 100 &#956;mole/l of nitrite were randomly distributed in different series of assays on the same day (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). The intra-day reproducibility characterized by C.V. was 8.8%, 7.1%, 6.7%, 5.1% and 4.5% for the assays of 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 and 25 &#956;mole/l of nitrite respectively. Similarly, midguts containing 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 and 25 &#956;mole/l of nitrate were randomly distributed in different series of assays on the same day. The intra-day reproducibility characterized by C.V. was 8.7%, 7.2%, 3.9%, 3.1% and 2.2% for the assays of 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 and 25 &#956;mole/l of nitrate, respectively.</p>
            <tbl id="T2">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Relative standard deviations (RSDs) and recoveries for NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>from mosquito midgut spiked with 1&#8211;100 &#956;M KNO<sub>2</sub>/KNO<sub>3 </sub>(mean &#177; SD, n= 6)</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="7">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Concentration (&#956;M)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="3" ca="center">
                        <p>NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="3" ca="center">
                        <p>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup></p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="6">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Intra-Assay RSD (%)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Inter-Assay RSD (%)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Recovery (%)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Intra-Assay RSD (%)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Inter-Assay RSD (%)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>Recovery (%)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0*</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>8.3</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>8.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.2</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>5.6</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>8.8</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>9.3</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>94.4 &#177; 4.4</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>8.7</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>9.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>98.9 &#177; 2.2</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>2.5</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>7.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>9.8</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>98.2+6.6</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>7.2</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>8.5</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>98.5 &#177; 2.4</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>5</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>6.7</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>9.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>95.2 &#177; 2.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>3.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>5.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>97.1 &#177; 1.8</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>10</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>5.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>9.2</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>98.5 &#177; 3.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>3.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>2.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>99 &#177; 5.4</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>25</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.5</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>5.3</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>99.8 &#177; 1.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>2.2</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>3.0</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>100 &#177; 5.8</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>50</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>5.5</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>100.5 &#177; 3.2</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>2.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>2.6</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>94.5 &#177; 6.2</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>100</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>3.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.7</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>97.3 &#177; 2.9</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.2</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.1</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>94.7 &#177; 5.9</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
               <tblfn>
                  <p>* Unspiked midgut samples, i.e. midgut samples to which exogenous NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>has not been added</p>
               </tblfn>
            </tbl>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Inter-day reproducibility</p>
            </st>
            <p>Aliquots of midguts containing 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10, 25, 50, and 100 &#956;mole/l of nitrite respectively were randomly distributed in different series of assays one by one during 10 days using each time the calibration curve of that day (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). The inter-day reproducibility precision values characterized by C.V. was 8.8%, 7.1%, 6.7%, 5.1% and 4.5% for the assays of 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 and 25 &#956;mole/l of nitrite, respectively. Similarly, midguts containing 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 and 25 &#956;mole/l of nitrate were randomly distributed in different series of assays one by one during 10 days using each time the calibration curve of that day. The inter-day reproducibility precision values characterized by C.V. were 9.9%, 8.5%, 7.2%, 2.9% and 3.0% for the assays of 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10 and 25 &#956;mole/l of nitrate, respectively.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Analytical findings</p>
            </st>
            <p>Nitric oxide is produced in large quantities during the host defense and immunologic reactions having anti-inflammatory and pro inflammatory properties. Haemolymph and midgut nitrite/nitrate concentrations (Figures <figr fid="F2">2</figr> and <figr fid="F3">3</figr>) in mosquitoes were found to be significantly higher then the control group (day 0) at any time of study (p &lt; 0.029). There was a significant difference both in <it>An.culicifaces </it>species A and Species B nitrite/nitrate levels (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>) at Day 7, Day 9&#8211;10, and Days 14&#8211;15 (p &lt; 0.04). The higher levels of nitrite/nitrate in midguts of refractory species B following <it>P. vivax </it>infected blood feeding provide new insights into the regulation of NO production in refractory species (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>) and may be important for the vectorial capacity of the mosquito to elucidate the mechanism of refractoriness.</p>
            <fig id="F2">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Haemolymph nitrite/nitrate of blood fed uninfected and blood fed <it>Plasmodium vivax</it>-infected <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>species B at 0, 7, 9&#8211;10 and 14&#8211;15 days pBM using a high performance anion liquid chromatography method</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Haemolymph nitrite/nitrate of blood fed uninfected and blood fed <it>Plasmodium vivax</it>-infected <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>species B at 0, 7, 9&#8211;10 and 14&#8211;15 days pBM using a high performance anion liquid chromatography method</b>. Means were analysed using a 2-way ANOVA (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1475-2875-7-71-2"/>
            </fig>
            <fig id="F3">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Midgut nitrite/nitrate of blood fed <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>species A and species B at 0, 7, 9&#8211;10 and 14&#8211;15 days pBM using a high performance anion liquid chromatography method</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Midgut nitrite/nitrate of blood fed <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>species A and species B at 0, 7, 9&#8211;10 and 14&#8211;15 days pBM using a high performance anion liquid chromatography method</b>. Means were analysed using a 2-way ANOVA (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1475-2875-7-71-3"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Discussion</p>
         </st>
         <p>Understanding the molecular mechanisms of the innate immune responses of Anopheles against Plasmodium parasites is of great importance for current efforts to develop novel strategies for malaria disease control <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>. The parasite undergoes substantial stage-specific losses during its development in the mosquito, which in some cases lead to complete refractoriness of the mosquito against the parasite. The underlying genetics of refractoriness are complex and multi-factorial <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. A variety of factors were shown to negatively affect the development of Plasmodium parasites in the mosquito, in some cases leading to complete transmission blockage <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>. Malaria parasite infection in anopheline mosquitoes is limited by inflammatory levels of nitric oxide metabolites <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>. As NO is very toxic and highly diffusible, its induction could have deleterious effects on the parasites and ookinetes invading the midgut epithelium <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp>. To assess the mechanisms of parasite stasis or toxicity, the biochemistry of these metabolites was evaluated within the blood-filled mosquito midgut as well as in the haemolymph.</p>
         <p>Various analytical techniques have been developed to determine nitrite and nitrate, oxidation metabolites of nitric oxide (NO) in biological samples <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr></abbrgrp>. In previous studies nitrite/nitrate was measured after exposing plasma to copper-cadmium-Zinc catalyst to convert nitrate to nitrite and then adding the effluent of the catalyst product to griess reagent <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. This procedure carries major disadvantages. Nitrite only is detected by griess reagent while nitrate has to be measured indirectly after reduction to nitrite. It is, therefore, not possible to predict how much of the sample's nitrate is converted to nitrite during the reductive process. Additionally, the complex formation of nitrite and griess reagent is a variable process and may influence the measurement of concentrations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>. Griess reagent reacts with free biogenic amines other then nitrite and may produce false positive results <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. UV/Vis absorbance <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp> and electrochemistry allows simultaneous detection of nitrite and nitrate but is vulnerable to severe interference from chloride present in biological samples <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Chemiluminesence <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp> and fluorescence detection <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp> improve the assay sensitivity and is unaffected by chloride but cannot be applied to simultaneous analysis of nitrite and nitrate. Recently developed fluorometric HPLC method involves the precolumn derivatization of nitrite with 2, 3-diaminonapthalene and enzymatic conversion of nitrite to nitrate <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. Measurement of nitric oxide itself is complicated by its short half life and would, therefore, require on-line measurement which is suitable for routine use for analysis of biological samples <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>After an exhaustive investigation, it appears that HPLC, which is a very sensitive, rapid and accurate method with a detection limit for nitrate of 0.1 &#956;M/L, carries none of these disadvantages and the degradation product of nitric oxide, nitrite and nitrate are measured directly. The chromatographic system developed in this study, after investigating alternatives, readily resolved NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, with peaks being separated by more then a minute as observed by Everett <it>et al </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr></abbrgrp> Anion exchange HPLC coupled with Microsep 3 K filters was found to be suitable and has been advocated by other laboratories as well. Ultrafiltration devices are efficient and permit rapid and easy clean up of the samples whilst avoiding problems relating to contaminants and interfering compounds. However, a Sphereclone column, a phosphate-based eluent and an acidic pH were used to achieve good separation. Particular attention was, however, focused on water quality and washing of plastics and glassware used for the preparation of solutions.</p>
         <p>A procedure was developed which may have application in routine extraction and determination of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in biological and clinical samples and offer opportunities for acquisition of data which reflects cellular generation of nitric oxide. The data indicate that circulating levels of nitrite/nitrate, end-products of NO synthesis, were significantly higher in Plasmodium-infected mosquito's midgut. This study implies that the expression of inhibitory mosquito midgut nitric oxide gene elements in response to blood meal may alter the mosquito's vectorial capacity. Mosquito molecules (NO) may be involved in oocyst killing that are refractory to the parasite and may act as an innate immune signal. This may lead to developing novel strategies for controlling the spread of malaria. Detailed knowledge of vector-parasite interactions, particularly in the midgut and the identification of critical mosquito molecules offers prospects for manipulating the vector for the control of malaria.</p>
         <p>To date the molecular basis of refractoriness and more generally parasite recognition and killing are not well understood. The identification and cloning of genes conferring mosquito refractoriness to the malaria parasite is critical for understanding malaria transmission mechanisms and holds great promise for developing novel approaches to malaria control. The increase in the production of nitrite/nitrate revealed that NOS may be used as an additional effector gene to block the development of the malaria parasite in mosquitoes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>. The present study furthers our understanding of the biochemistry of midgut defense reactions to parasite invasion and how these may influence the efficiency of malaria transmission by anopheline mosquitoes. The present study is highly relevant in view of the current research interest in driving the refractory genes expression into vector populations as a means of interrupting malaria transmission <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp> and will provide important insight towards the development of malaria control strategies.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusion</p>
         </st>
         <p>The procedure described in this paper is suitable for the routine determination of nitrite and nitrate. It has proved a sensitive, accurate and reproducible method. The principal strength of this procedure, is its simplicity. This anion HPLC method coupled with ultrafiltration to reduce protein and salt contaminants has not been used before to measure midgut and haemolymph, nitrite and nitrate concentrations in mosquitoes. This method can be used for the detection, identification and quantitative measurement of all nitric oxide metabolites namely nitrite and nitrate thus making it an effective tool for diagnostic purposes and useful for identifying the AcNOS gene products that may impart refractory phenotype that is associated with the immune response to malaria parasites. Such responses may be important for the vectorial capacity of the mosquito and understanding of parasite-vector interactions and mechanism of refractoriness. This procedure may also be suitable for routine determination of NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>in various other biological fluids/samples.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>AS conceived and supervised the experimental work, carried out mosquito manipulation, HPLC analyses and the writing of the manuscript. KR carried out the mosquito rearing and mosquito dissections. TA carried out the mosquito membrane feeding experiments. APD provided facilities and scientific environment for experimental work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>The authors are thankful to Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi for the financial support to this work. We thank Bhanu Arya and Mrs. Poonam Gupta for technical assistance and secretarial support.</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Oaks</snm>
                  <fnm>SC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mitchell</snm>
                  <fnm>VS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pearson</snm>
                  <fnm>GW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Carpenter</snm>
                  <fnm>CCJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <cnm>Eds</cnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Malaria obstacles and opportunities</source>
            <publisher>National Academy Press Washington USA</publisher>
            <pubdate>1991</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>The effect of insecticide treated bed nets on mortality of Gambian children</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Alonso</snm>
                  <fnm>PL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lindsay</snm>
                  <fnm>SW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Armstrong</snm>
                  <fnm>JRM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>de Francisco</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shenton</snm>
                  <fnm>FC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Greenwood</snm>
                  <fnm>BM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Conteh</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cham</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hill</snm>
                  <fnm>AG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>David</snm>
                  <fnm>PH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fegan</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hall</snm>
                  <fnm>AJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Lancet</source>
            <pubdate>1991</pubdate>
            <volume>337</volume>
            <fpage>1499</fpage>
            <lpage>502</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0140-6736(91)93194-E</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">1675368</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>Vector Biology and Control of Malaria in Africa</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Collins</snm>
                  <fnm>FH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Besanky</snm>
                  <fnm>NJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Science</source>
            <pubdate>1994</pubdate>
            <volume>264</volume>
            <fpage>1874</fpage>
            <lpage>1875</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.8009215</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8009215</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>Genetics of mosquito vector competence</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Beernsten</snm>
                  <fnm>BT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>James</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Christensen</snm>
                  <fnm>BM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Microbiol Mol Biol Rev</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>64</volume>
            <fpage>115</fpage>
            <lpage>137</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">98988</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10704476</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/MMBR.64.1.115-137.2000</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>Genetic selection of a <it>Plasmodium</it>-refractory strain of the malaria vector <it>Anopheles gambiae</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Collins</snm>
                  <fnm>FH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sakai</snm>
                  <fnm>RK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vernick</snm>
                  <fnm>KD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Paskewitz</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Seeley</snm>
                  <fnm>DG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Miller</snm>
                  <fnm>LH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Collins</snm>
                  <fnm>WE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Campbell</snm>
                  <fnm>CC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gwadz</snm>
                  <fnm>RW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Science</source>
            <pubdate>1986</pubdate>
            <volume>234</volume>
            <fpage>607</fpage>
            <lpage>610</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1126/science.3532325</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">3532325</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>Selection of <it>Anopheles stephensi </it>for refractoriness and susceptibility to <it>Plasmodium falciparum</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Feldmann</snm>
                  <fnm>AM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ponnudurai</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Med Vet Entomol</source>
            <pubdate>1989</pubdate>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <fpage>41</fpage>
            <lpage>52</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2915.1989.tb00473.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">2519646</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <title>
               <p>Isolation of a <it>Plasmodium vivax </it>refractory <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>strain from India</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Adak</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Singh</snm>
                  <fnm>OP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nanda</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sharma</snm>
                  <fnm>VP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Subbarao</snm>
                  <fnm>SK</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Trop Med Int Health</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <fpage>1</fpage>
            <lpage>7</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p><it>Plasmodium gallinaceum</it>: a refractory mechanism of ookinete killing in the mosquito, <it>Anopheles gambiae</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vernick</snm>
                  <fnm>KD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fujioka</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Seeley</snm>
                  <fnm>DC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tandler</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Aikawa</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Miller</snm>
                  <fnm>LH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Exp Parasitol</source>
            <pubdate>1995</pubdate>
            <volume>80</volume>
            <fpage>583</fpage>
            <lpage>595</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/expr.1995.1074</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7758539</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>Analysis of the Plasmodium and Anopheles transcriptional repertoire during ookinete development and midgut invasion</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abraham</snm>
                  <fnm>EG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Islam</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Srinivasan</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ghosh</snm>
                  <fnm>AK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Valenzuela</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ribeiro</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kafatos</snm>
                  <fnm>FC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dimopoulos</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jacobs-Lorena</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>279</volume>
            <fpage>5573</fpage>
            <lpage>5580</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M307582200</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14627712</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>Analysis of the <it>Plasmodium and Anopheles </it>transcriptomes during oocyst differentiation</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Srinivasan</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abraham</snm>
                  <fnm>EG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ghosh</snm>
                  <fnm>AK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Valenzuela</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ribeiro</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dimopoulos</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kafatos</snm>
                  <fnm>FC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Adams</snm>
                  <fnm>JH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fujioka</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jacobs-Lorena</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biol Chem</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>279</volume>
            <fpage>5581</fpage>
            <lpage>5587</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M307587200</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14627711</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>Biological problems with the replacement of a vector population by Plasmodium-refractory mosquitoes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Curtis</snm>
                  <fnm>CF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pates</snm>
                  <fnm>HV</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Takken</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maxwell</snm>
                  <fnm>CA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Myamba</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Priestman</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Akinpelu</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yayo</snm>
                  <fnm>AM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hu</snm>
                  <fnm>JT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Parassitologia</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <fpage>479</fpage>
            <lpage>81</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">10697905</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>Immune mechanisms in insects</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lackie</snm>
                  <fnm>AM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Parasitol Today</source>
            <pubdate>1988</pubdate>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <fpage>98</fpage>
            <lpage>105</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0169-4758(88)90035-X</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15463055</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>The mosquito <it>Anopheles stephensi </it>limits malaria parasite development with inducible synthesis of nitric oxide</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Luckart</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vodovotz</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cui</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rosenberg</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>95</volume>
            <fpage>5700</fpage>
            <lpage>5705</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">20442</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9576947</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.95.10.5700</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Gene structure and polymorphism of an invertebrate nitric oxide synthase gene</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Luckart</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rosenberg</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Gene</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>232</volume>
            <fpage>25</fpage>
            <lpage>34</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00121-3</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10333518</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>Induction of nitric oxide synthase in <it>Anopheles stephensi </it>by <it>Plasmodium falciparum</it>: mechanism of signaling and the role of parasite glycosylphosphatidylinositols</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lim</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gowda</snm>
                  <fnm>DC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Krishnegowda</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Luckart</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Infect Immun</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>73</volume>
            <fpage>2778</fpage>
            <lpage>2789</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1087374</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15845481</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/IAI.73.5.2778-2789.2005</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>Killing of <it>Plasmodium falciparum </it>in vitro by nitric oxide derivatives</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rockett</snm>
                  <fnm>KA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Awburn</snm>
                  <fnm>MM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cowden</snm>
                  <fnm>WB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Clark</snm>
                  <fnm>IA</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Infect Immun</source>
            <pubdate>1991</pubdate>
            <volume>59</volume>
            <fpage>3280</fpage>
            <lpage>3283</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">258164</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">1879941</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B17">
            <title>
               <p>Adaptation of the Griess reaction for detection of nitrite in human plasma</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Giustarini</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dalle-Donne</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Colombo</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Milzani</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rossi</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Free Radic Res</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>38</volume>
            <fpage>1235</fpage>
            <lpage>1240</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10715760400017327</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15621701</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B18">
            <title>
               <p>Sequential injection analysis of nitrites and nitrates in human serum using nitrate reductase</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pinto</snm>
                  <fnm>PCAG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lima</snm>
                  <fnm>JLFC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>de Sousa Saraiva</snm>
                  <fnm>MLMF</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Clin Chim Acta</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>337</volume>
            <fpage>69</fpage>
            <lpage>76</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.cccn.2003.07.012</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14568182</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B19">
            <title>
               <p>Control of coronary vascular tone by nitric oxide</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kelm</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schrader</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Circ Res</source>
            <pubdate>1990</pubdate>
            <volume>66</volume>
            <fpage>1561</fpage>
            <lpage>1575</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">2160870</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B20">
            <title>
               <p>Methods of quantitative analysis of the nitric oxide metabolites nitrite and nitrate in human biological fluids</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tsikas</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Free Redic Res</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <fpage>797</fpage>
            <lpage>815</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/10715760500053651</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B21">
            <title>
               <p>Measurement of serum nitrite/nitrate concentrations using high-performance liquid chromatography</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Menyawi</snm>
                  <fnm>IE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Looareesuwan</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Knapp</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Thalhammer</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stoier</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Burgmann</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography B</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>706</volume>
            <fpage>347</fpage>
            <lpage>351</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00570-7</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B22">
            <title>
               <p>Measurement of nitric oxide metabolites in brain microdialysates by a sensitive fluorometric high-performance liquid chromatography assay</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Woitzik</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abromeit</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schaefer</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Anal Biochem</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>289</volume>
            <fpage>10</fpage>
            <lpage>17</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/abio.2000.4893</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11161289</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B23">
            <title>
               <p>Rapid and sensitive determination of nitrite in foods and biological materials by flow injection or high-performance liquid chromatography with chemiluminescence detection</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sen</snm>
                  <fnm>NP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Baddoo</snm>
                  <fnm>PA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Seaman</snm>
                  <fnm>SW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography</source>
            <pubdate>1994</pubdate>
            <volume>673</volume>
            <fpage>77</fpage>
            <lpage>84</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0021-9673(94)87059-4</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B24">
            <title>
               <p>Ion chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of nitrate and nitrite in human saliva</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Helaleh</snm>
                  <fnm>MIH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Korenaga</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>744</volume>
            <fpage>433</fpage>
            <lpage>437</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00264-4</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B25">
            <title>
               <p>Measurement of nitrite and nitrate in plasma, serum and urine of humans by high performance liquid chromatography, the griess assay, chemiluminiscence and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: Interferences by biogenic amines and N-nitro-L arginine analogs</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tsikas</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fuchs</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gutzki</snm>
                  <fnm>FM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Frolich</snm>
                  <fnm>JC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography B</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>715</volume>
            <fpage>441</fpage>
            <lpage>444</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0378-4347(98)00326-0</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B26">
            <title>
               <p>Rapid determination of nitrite by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Meininger</snm>
                  <fnm>CJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wu</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography B</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>746</volume>
            <fpage>199</fpage>
            <lpage>207</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00328-5</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B27">
            <title>
               <p>Analysis of nitrite and nitrate in biological samples using high-performance liquid chromatography</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jobgen</snm>
                  <fnm>WS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jobgen</snm>
                  <fnm>SC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Meininger</snm>
                  <fnm>CJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wu</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography B</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>851</volume>
            <fpage>71</fpage>
            <lpage>82</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.018</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B28">
            <title>
               <p>Susceptibility of <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>species A and B to <it>Plasmodium vivax </it>and <it>Plasmodium falciparum </it>as determined by immunoradiomatric assay</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Subbarao</snm>
                  <fnm>SK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Adak</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vasantha</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Joshi</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Raghavendra</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cochrane</snm>
                  <fnm>AH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nussenzweig</snm>
                  <fnm>RS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sharma</snm>
                  <fnm>VP</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg</source>
            <pubdate>1988</pubdate>
            <volume>82</volume>
            <fpage>394</fpage>
            <lpage>397</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0035-9203(88)90132-0</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">3068854</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B29">
            <title>
               <p>Heterogeneity in patterns of malarial oocyst infections in the mosquito vectors</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Medley</snm>
                  <fnm>GF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sinden</snm>
                  <fnm>RE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fleck</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Billingsley</snm>
                  <fnm>PF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tirawanchi</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rodriguez</snm>
                  <fnm>MH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Parasitology</source>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
            <volume>106</volume>
            <fpage>441</fpage>
            <lpage>449</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">8341579</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B30">
            <title>
               <p>Comparative susceptibility of different members of the <it>Anopheles culicifacies </it>complex to <it>Plasmodium vivax</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Adak</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kaur</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Singh</snm>
                  <fnm>OP</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>93</volume>
            <fpage>573</fpage>
            <lpage>577</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90052-4</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">10717735</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B31">
            <title>
               <p>International Conferences of Harmonization (ICH) Guidance for Bioanalytical Methods Validation</p>
            </title>
            <source>Center for Evaluation and Research (CDER)</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <url>http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4252fnl.htm</url>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B32">
            <title>
               <p>Mosquito immunity against Plasmodium</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Michel</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kafatos</snm>
                  <fnm>FC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Insect Biochem Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>35</volume>
            <fpage>677</fpage>
            <lpage>689</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.02.009</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15894185</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B33">
            <title>
               <p>Inhibition of malaria parasite development in mosquitoes by anti-mosquito-midgut antibodies</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lal</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schriefer</snm>
                  <fnm>ME</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sacci</snm>
                  <fnm>JB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Goldman</snm>
                  <fnm>IF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Louis-Wileman</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Collins</snm>
                  <fnm>WE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Azad</snm>
                  <fnm>AF</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Infect Immun</source>
            <pubdate>1994</pubdate>
            <volume>62</volume>
            <fpage>316</fpage>
            <lpage>318</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">186104</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8262645</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B34">
            <title>
               <p>Anti-mosquito midgut antibodies block development of <it>Plasmodium falciparum </it>and <it>Plasmodium vivax </it>in multiple species of Anopheles mosquitoes and reduce vector fecundity and survivorship</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lal</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Patterson</snm>
                  <fnm>PS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sacci</snm>
                  <fnm>JB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vaughan</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Paul</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Collins</snm>
                  <fnm>WE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wirtz</snm>
                  <fnm>RA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Azad</snm>
                  <fnm>AF</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>98</volume>
            <fpage>5228</fpage>
            <lpage>5233</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">33192</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11309510</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.091447398</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B35">
            <title>
               <p>Nitric oxide metabolites induced in Anopheles stephensi control malaria parasite infection</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Peterson</snm>
                  <fnm>TM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gow</snm>
                  <fnm>AJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Luckhart</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Free Radic Biol Med</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>42</volume>
            <fpage>132</fpage>
            <lpage>142</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1764505</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17157200</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.10.037</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B36">
            <title>
               <p>Nitric oxide and reactive nitrogen intermediates during lethal and nonlethal strains of murine malaria</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nahrevanian</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dascombe</snm>
                  <fnm>MJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Parasitol Immunol</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <fpage>491</fpage>
            <lpage>501</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3024.2001.00406.x</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B37">
            <title>
               <p>Transgenic anopheline mosquitoes impaired in transmission of a malaria parasite</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ito</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ghosh</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moreira</snm>
                  <fnm>LA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wimmer</snm>
                  <fnm>EA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jacobs-Lorena</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nature</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>417</volume>
            <fpage>452</fpage>
            <lpage>455</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/417452a</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12024215</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B38">
            <title>
               <p>Parasite killing in <it>Plasmodium vivax </it>malaria by nitric oxide: implication of aspartic protease inhibition</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sharma</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Eapen</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Subbarao</snm>
                  <fnm>SK</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Biochem (Tokyo)</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>136</volume>
            <fpage>329</fpage>
            <lpage>334</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B39">
            <title>
               <p>Increased nitric oxide production and protection from malaria</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wang</snm>
                  <fnm>WY</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Adams</snm>
                  <fnm>DJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Lancet</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>361</volume>
            <fpage>610</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12531-7</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12598162</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B40">
            <title>
               <p>Nitric oxide limits parasite development in vectors and in invertebrate intermediate hosts</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ascenzi</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gradoni</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>IUBMB Life</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <fpage>121</fpage>
            <lpage>123</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/15216540213467</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">12049194</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B41">
            <title>
               <p>Simultaneous increases in immune-competent cells and nitric oxide in the spleen during <it>Plasmodium berghei </it>infection in mice</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nahrevanian</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dascombe</snm>
                  <fnm>MJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Microbiol Immunol Infect</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <fpage>11</fpage>
            <lpage>17</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16440118</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B42">
            <title>
               <p><it>Plasmodium berghei </it>ookinetes induce nitric oxide production in <it>Anopheles pseudopunctipennis </it>midguts cultured in vitro</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Herrera-Ortiz</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lanz-Mendoza</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Martinez-Barnetche</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hernandez-Martinez</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Villarreal-Trevino</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Aguilar-Marcelino</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rodriguez</snm>
                  <fnm>MH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Insect Biochem Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>34</volume>
            <fpage>893</fpage>
            <lpage>901</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.05.007</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15350609</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B43">
            <title>
               <p>Analysis of nitrite and nitrate in biological fluids by assays based on griess reaction: Appraisal of the griess reaction in the l-arginine/nitric oxide area of research</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tsikas</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography B</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>851</volume>
            <fpage>51</fpage>
            <lpage>70</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.054</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B44">
            <title>
               <p>Evaluation of methods for the extraction of nitrite and nitrate in biological fluids employing high performance anion exchange liquid chromatography for their determination</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Smith</snm>
                  <fnm>CCT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stanyer</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Betteridge</snm>
                  <fnm>DJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography B</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>779</volume>
            <fpage>201</fpage>
            <lpage>209</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00376-8</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B45">
            <title>
               <p>Nitric oxide in biological fluids: analysis of nitrite and nitrate by high-performance ion chromatography</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Everett</snm>
                  <fnm>SA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dennis</snm>
                  <fnm>MF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tozer</snm>
                  <fnm>GM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Prise</snm>
                  <fnm>VE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wardman</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Statford</snm>
                  <fnm>MRL</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Chromatography</source>
            <pubdate>1995</pubdate>
            <volume>706</volume>
            <fpage>437</fpage>
            <lpage>442</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0021-9673(95)00078-2</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
