Table 3 |
|||
|
Protective Efficacy (%) of two formulated mixtures of human-derived semiochemicals and DEET (10% concentration) in arm-in-cage experiments |
|||
|
Time post application (hrs) |
DEET |
Mixture 1 |
Mixture 3 |
|
|
|||
|
Anopheles gambiae |
|||
|
0 |
100 (± 0)a* |
100 (± 0)a* |
100 (± 0)a* |
|
2 |
100 (± 0)a* |
89.4(± 3.7)a* |
98.5 (± 1.51)a* |
|
4 |
100 (± 0)a* |
54.9 (± 4.5)b* |
64.3 (± 6.15)b* |
|
6 |
100 (± 0)a* |
32.1 (± 5.6)c* |
38.8 (± 4.31)c* |
|
8 |
94.4 (± 1)b* |
12.5 (± 2.1)d |
30.8 (± 6.96)c* |
|
Culex quinquefasciatus |
|||
|
0 |
100 (± 0)a* |
100 (± 0)a* |
100 (± 0)a* |
|
2 |
100 (± 0)a* |
89 (± 4.2)a* |
98.6 (± 1.43)a* |
|
4 |
100 (± 0)a* |
56.2 (± 4.4)b* |
80 (± 1.7)b* |
|
6 |
100 (± 0)a* |
28.5 (± 5.2)c* |
60.9 (± 3.1)c* |
|
8 |
93.3 (± 4.08)b* |
19.8 (± 3.2)c* |
45.8 (± 4.1)d* |
|
Aedes aegypti |
|||
|
0 |
100 (± 0)a* |
46.5 (± 9.9)a* |
60 (± 9.8)a* |
|
1 |
100 (± 0)a* |
46.1 (± 9.9)a* |
43.6 (± 9.9)ab* |
|
2 |
100 (± 0)a* |
13.8 (± 6.9)b* |
30.9 (± 9.2)bc* |
|
3 |
100 (± 0)a* |
-8.6 (± 5.6)b |
21.1 (± 5.6)cd* |
|
4 |
100 (± 0)a* |
17.2 (± 7.6)bc |
11.3 (± 6.3)d |
|
5 |
100 (± 0)a* |
10.3 (± 6.09)bc |
7.04 (± 5.1)d |
|
6 |
100 (± 0)a* |
-15.5 (± 7.24)c |
-16.9 (± 7.2)e |
|
7 |
97 (± 1.95)b* |
1.7 (± 2.6)c |
-2.8 (± 2.6)e |
|
8 |
96.1 (± 1.94)b* |
-8.6 (± 5.6)c |
-2.9 (± 3.3)e |
|
|
|||
|
Mixture 1 = 1:1:1:1:1 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one:octanal:nonanal:decanal:geranylacetone Mixture 3 = 1:1 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one:geranylacetone Means followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05) P.E. = protective efficacy (% formulation control mean - % test mean/% formulation control mean) *Significantly different from the control (formulation-treated arm) (P < 0.05) |
|||
|
Logan et al. Malaria Journal 2010 9:239 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-239 |
|||