Table 2 |
|||||
|
Multivariate analysis: hole index value per net by person-type adjusted for confounders |
|||||
|
Hole index |
Coefficient |
Coefficient 95% CI |
Incident Rate Ratio (e^coefficient) |
Incident Rate Ratio 95% CI |
P value |
|
|
|||||
|
Overall |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
F = 22.63 p < 0.0001 α = 3.2 (2.9,3.6) |
|
|
|||||
|
Constant |
1.7 |
[1.2, 2.2] |
------- |
------- |
<0.0001 |
|
|
|||||
|
Person Type |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Infants (<1 y) |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
|
|
|||||
|
Young Children (1-4 y) |
0.25 |
[0.024,0.48] |
1.3 |
[1.0,1.6] |
0.031 |
|
|
|||||
|
Older Children (5-14 y) |
0.28 |
[0.070,0.50] |
1.3 |
[1.1,1.6] |
0.01 |
|
|
|||||
|
Adult Males (≥15 y) |
0.19 |
[-0.018,0.39] |
1.2 |
[0.98,1.5] |
0.074 |
|
|
|||||
|
Non-Pregnant Females (15-49 y) |
0.19 |
[-0.016,0.39] |
1.2 |
[0.98,1.5] |
0.071 |
|
|
|||||
|
Pregnant Females |
0.18 |
[-0.31,0.66] |
1.2 |
[0.73,1.9] |
0.481 |
|
|
|||||
|
Older Females (≥50 y) |
0.28 |
[-0.006,0.57] |
1.3 |
[0.99,1.8] |
0.055 |
|
|
|||||
|
Used Voucher |
-0.79 |
[-1.11,-0.47] |
0.45 |
[0.33,0.63] |
<0.0001 |
|
|
|||||
|
Net Age |
0.042 |
[0.035,0.049] |
1.04 |
[1.04,1.05] |
<0.0001 |
|
|
|||||
|
Net Size |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
3.5 ft × 6 ft |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
|
|
|||||
|
4 ft × 6 ft |
-0.28 |
[-0.50,-0.062] |
0.76 |
[0.61,0.94] |
0.012 |
|
|
|||||
|
6 ft × 6 ft |
-0.32 |
[-0.57,-0.066] |
0.73 |
0.57,0.94] |
0.014 |
|
|
|||||
|
Net Source |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Shop |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
|
|
|||||
|
Hawker/Shifting |
0.14 |
[-0.074,0.35] |
1.1 |
[0.93,1.4] |
0.204 |
|
|
|||||
|
Health Facility/Gov/NGO |
-0.22 |
[-0.50,0.055] |
0.80 |
[0.61,1.1] |
0.115 |
|
|
|||||
|
Gift/Other/Not Sure |
-0.22 |
[-0.55,0.10] |
0.80 |
[0.58,1.1] |
0.172 |
|
|
|||||
|
Treatment Status |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Never Treated |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
|
|
|||||
|
Expired Treatment |
0.10 |
[-0.14,0.34] |
1.1 |
[0.87,1.4] |
0.407 |
|
|
|||||
|
ITN |
0.09 |
[-0.10,0.29] |
1.1 |
[0.90,1.3] |
0.345 |
|
|
|||||
|
# of Sleepers Under Same Net |
-0.067 |
[-0.16,0.022] |
0.93 |
[0.85,1.0] |
0.14 |
|
|
|||||
|
Socioeconomic Status |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
SES Quintile 0 (poorest) |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
------- |
|
|
|||||
|
SES Quintile 1 |
-0.23 |
[-0.60,0.15] |
0.80 |
[0.55,1.2] |
0.237 |
|
|
|||||
|
SES Quintile 2 |
0.016 |
[-0.38,0.41] |
1.0 |
[0.68,1.5] |
0.935 |
|
|
|||||
|
SES Quintile 3 |
-0.17 |
[-0.54,0.20] |
0.85 |
[0.59,1.2] |
0.378 |
|
|
|||||
|
SES Quintile 4 (least poor) |
-0.31 |
[-0.70,0.074] |
0.73 |
[0.50,1.1] |
0.112 |
|
|
|||||
|
Adjusted for the following confounders: whether the net was purchased using a voucher, net age, net size, net source, treatment status, number of sleepers under same net, and socioeconomic status of the household |
|||||
|
Tsuang et al. Malaria Journal 2010 9:211 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-211 |
|||||
