Table 7

Estimated diagnostic accuracy of RDT for malaria - attributable fever during the low and high transmission seasons

Age

Febrile

Malaria-attributable

Not malaria-attributable

SE

SP

PPV

NPV

(years)

N

TP (a)

FN (b)

FP (c)

TN (d)


Low transmission (dry) season

< 1

143

4.4

0.2

35.9

102.4

95

74

11

99.8

1 - 4

299

8.8

0.5

88.2

201.5

94

70

9

99.7

5 - 14

130

4.0

0.3

39.9

85.7

93

68

9

99.7

15+

280

2.5

0.3

46.2

230.9

89

83

5

99.9


All

852

19.8

1.3

210.3

620.6

94

75

9

99.8


High transmission (rainy) season

< 1

159

113.6

3.3

25.5

16.7

97

40

82

84

1 - 4

504

293.2

7.7

130.2

72.9

97

36

69

90

5 - 14

275

113.4

4.0

99.6

58.1

97

37

53

94

15+

379

45.7

1.4

74.4

257.4

97

78

38

99.4


All

1317

565.8

16.4

329.7

405.1

97

55

63

96


N: number of febrile patients in each age-parasite density combination.

TP, FN, FP, TN: expected number of true positives, false negatives, false positives and true negatives of the RDT for clinical malaria diagnosis among the N febrile cases in each age-parasite density combination. Estimates obtained from N, AF and Prob RDT + (see methods). Numbers presented are rounded to 1 decimal place; actual calculations based on a better numerical precision.

SE, SP, PPV, NPV: estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of RDT for clinical malaria.

Bisoffi et al. Malaria Journal 2010 9:192   doi:10.1186/1475-2875-9-192

Open Data