Comparison of surveillance methods applied to a situation of low malaria prevalence at rural sites in The Gambia and Guinea Bissau

doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-274

Malaria Journal

Volume 8

Viewing options:

Abstract
Full text
PDF (393KB)
Additional files

Associated material:

Related literature:

Articles citing this article
on Google Scholar
on PubMed Central
Other articles by authors
on Google Scholar

Satoguina J
Walther B
Drakeley C
Nwakanma D
Oriero EC
Correa S
Corran P
Conway DJ
Walther M

on PubMed

Satoguina J
Walther B
Drakeley C
Nwakanma D
Oriero EC
Correa S
Corran P
Conway DJ
Walther M
Related articles/pages
on Google

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Tools:

Post to:

Research

Comparison of surveillance methods applied to a situation of low malaria prevalence at rural sites in The Gambia and Guinea Bissau

Judith Satoguina¹ , Brigitte Walther¹ , Christopher Drakeley² , Davis Nwakanma¹ , Eniyou C Oriero¹ , Simon Correa² , Patrick Corran²^,3 , David J Conway¹^,2 and Michael Walther¹

¹Medical Research Council Laboratories, Fajara, PO Box 273 Banjul, The Gambia

²Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

³Biotherapeutics Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Herts EN6 3QG, UK

author email corresponding author email

Malaria Journal 2009, 8:274doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-274


Published:	2 December 2009

Abstract

Background

Health record-based observations from several parts of Africa indicate a major decline in malaria, but up-to-date information on parasite prevalence in West-Africa is sparse. This study aims to provide parasite prevalence data from three sites in the Gambia and Guinea Bissau, respectively, and compares the usefulness of PCR, rapid diagnostic tests (RDT), serology and slide-microscopy for surveillance.

Methods

Cross-sectional surveys in 12 villages at three rural sites were carried out in the Gambia and Guinea Bissau in January/February 2008, shortly following the annual transmission season.

Results

A surprisingly low microscopically detectable parasite prevalence was detected in the Gambia (Farafenni: 10.9%, CI95%: 8.7-13.1%; Basse: 9.0%, CI95%: 7.2-10.8%), and Guinea Bissau (Caio: 4%, CI95%: 2.6-5.4%), with low parasite densities (geometric mean: 104 parasites/μl, CI95%: 76-143/μl). In comparison, PCR detected a more than three times higher proportion of parasite carriers, indicating its usefulness to sensitively identify foci where malaria declines, whereas the RDT had very low sensitivity. Estimates of force of infection using age sero-conversion rates were equivalent to an EIR of approximately 1 infectious bite/person/year, significantly less than previous estimates. The sero-prevalence profiles suggest a gradual decline of malaria transmission, confirming their usefulness in providing information on longer term trends of transmission. A greater variability in parasite prevalence among villages within a site than between sites was observed with all methods. The fact that serology equally captured the inter-village variability, indicates that the observed heterogeneity represents a stable pattern.

Conclusion

PCR and serology may be used as complementary tools to survey malaria in areas of declining malaria prevalence such as the Gambia and Guinea Bissau.