Log on/register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 
Open AccessResearch

Safety and tolerability of artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for malaria in young HIV-infected and uninfected children

Shereen Katrak1,2 email, Anne Gasasira2,3 email, Emmanuel Arinaitwe3 email, Abel Kakuru3 email, Humphrey Wanzira3 email, Victor Bigira3 email, Taylor G Sandison4 email, Jaco Homsy5,6 email, Jordan W Tappero6 email, Moses R Kamya7 email and Grant Dorsey8 email

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA

Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, USA

Makerere University - University of California San Francisco Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, USA

Global AIDS Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA

Department of Medicine, Makerere University Medical School, Kampala, Uganda

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0811, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

author email corresponding author email

Malaria Journal 2009, 8:272doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-272

Published: 30 November 2009

Abstract

Background

Artemisinin combination therapy has become the standard of care for uncomplicated malaria in most of Africa. However, there is limited data on the safety and tolerability of these drugs, especially in young children and patients co-infected with HIV.

Methods

A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a cohort of HIV-infected and uninfected children aged 4-22 months in Tororo, Uganda. Participants were randomized to treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) upon diagnosis of their first episode of uncomplicated malaria and received the same regimen for all subsequent episodes. Participants were actively monitored for adverse events for 28 days and then passively for up to 63 days after treatment. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (registration # NCT00527800).

Results

A total of 122 children were randomized to AL and 124 to DP, resulting in 412 and 425 treatments, respectively. Most adverse events were rare, with only cough, diarrhoea, vomiting, and anaemia occurring in more than 1% of treatments. There were no differences in the risk of these events between treatment groups. Younger age was associated with an increased risk of diarrhoea in both the AL and DP treatment arms. Retreatment for malaria within 17-28 days was associated with an increased risk of vomiting in the DP treatment arm (HR = 6.47, 95% CI 2.31-18.1, p < 0.001). There was no increase in the risk of diarrhoea or vomiting for children who were HIV-infected or on concomitant therapy with antiretrovirals or trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole prophylaxis.

Conclusion

Both AL and DP were safe and well tolerated for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in young HIV-infected and uninfected children.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00527800; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00527800 webcite


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.