Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch

Chloroquine resistance before and after its withdrawal in Kenya

Leah Mwai1,2* email, Edwin Ochong3* email, Abdi Abdirahman1 email, Steven M Kiara1 email, Steve Ward3 email, Gilbert Kokwaro4 email, Philip Sasi1 email, Kevin Marsh1,2 email, Steffen Borrmann1,5 email, Margaret Mackinnon1,6 email and Alexis Nzila1,2,3,7 email

Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)/Wellcome Trust Collaborative Research Programme, PO Box 230, 80108, Kilifi, Kenya

University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK

Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)/Wellcome Trust Collaborative Research Programme, PO Box 43640, 00100, Nairobi, Kenya

Heidelberg University School of Medicine, Institute of Hygiene, FRG, Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Rd, Cambridge, CB2 1QP, UK

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally

Malaria Journal 2009, 8:106doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-106

Published: 18 May 2009

Abstract

Background

The spread of resistance to chloroquine (CQ) led to its withdrawal from use in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa in the 1990s. In Malawi, this withdrawal was followed by a rapid reduction in the frequency of resistance to the point where the drug is now considered to be effective once again, just nine years after its withdrawal. In this report, the polymorphisms of markers associated with CQ-resistance against Plasmodium falciparum isolates from coastal Kenya (Kilifi) were investigated, from 1993, prior to the withdrawal of CQ, to 2006, seven years after its withdrawal. Changes to those that occurred in the dihydrofolate reductase gene (dhfr) that confers resistance to the replacement drug, pyrimethamine/sulphadoxine were also compared.

Methods

Mutations associated with CQ resistance, at codons 76 of pfcrt, at 86 of pfmdr1, and at codons 51, 59 and 164 of dhfr were analysed using PCR-restriction enzyme methods. In total, 406, 240 and 323 isolates were genotyped for pfcrt-76, pfmdr1-86 and dhfr, respectively.

Results

From 1993 to 2006, the frequency of the pfcrt-76 mutant significantly decreased from around 95% to 60%, while the frequency of pfmdr1-86 did not decline, remaining around 75%. Though the frequency of dhfr mutants was already high (around 80%) at the start of the study, this frequency increased to above 95% during the study period. Mutation at codon 164 of dhfr was analysed in 2006 samples, and none of them had this mutation.

Conclusion

In accord with the study in Malawi, a reduction in resistance to CQ following official withdrawal in 1999 was found, but unlike Malawi, the decline of resistance to CQ in Kilifi was much slower. It is estimated that, at current rates of decline, it will take 13 more years for the clinical efficacy of CQ to be restored in Kilifi. In addition, CQ resistance was declining before the drug's official withdrawal, suggesting that, prior to the official ban, the use of CQ had decreased, probably due to its poor clinical effectiveness.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.