Table 3 |
||||||
|
Sources of nets used the previous night in Rufiji District during 2006 household survey by socioeconomic status |
||||||
| Bed net source |
Most poor |
Very poor |
Poor |
Less poor |
Least poor |
Concentration Index |
|
|
||||||
| N (6323 overall)a |
985 |
1249 |
1398 |
1357 |
1334 |
|
| Proportion use (% (95% CI)) |
||||||
| No net |
66.8 (63.8, 69.7) |
42.5 (39.8, 45.3) |
36.6 (34.1, 39.2) |
30.1 (27.8, 32.6) |
19.0 (17.0, 21.2) |
-0.214 (-0.335, -0.093) |
| Voucher |
5.8 (4.5, 7.4) |
8.3 (6.9, 10.0) |
9.4 (8.0, 11.0) |
10.6 (9.1, 12.4) |
8.9 (7.4, 10.5) |
0.067 (-0.027, 0.161) |
| Free-Vaccine |
11.2 (9.3, 13.3) |
19.6 (17.5, 21.9) |
20.7(18.7, 23.0) |
20.2 (18.1, 22.4) |
14.4 (12.6, 16.4) |
0.015 (-0.129, 0.159) |
| Free-Other |
6.2 (4.8, 7.9) |
8.6 (7.1, 10.3) |
8.1 (6.8, 9.6) |
7.1 (5.9, 8.6) |
7.1 (5.8, 8.6) |
-0.005 (-0.074, 0.064) |
| Commercial market |
9.8 (8.0, 11.8) |
20.4 (18.3, 22.7) |
24.1 (21.9, 26.4) |
31.6 (29.2, 34.1) |
50.3 (47.6, 53.0) |
0.254 (0.119, 0.389) |
| Unknown source |
0.3 (0.1, 0.9) |
0.6 (0.3, 1.2) |
1.1 (0.6, 1.8) |
0.3(0.1, 0.8) |
0.4 (0.2, 0.9) |
-0.045 (-0.295, 0.205) |
| Any sourceb |
33.3 (30.3, 36.1) |
57.5 (54.7, 60.2) |
63.4 (60.8, 65.9) |
69.9 (67.3, 72.1) |
81.1 (78.8, 83.0) |
0.127 (0.021, 0.234) |
|
|
||||||
|
a Do not add up to 6338 (see tables 1) because data on households' assets and housing characteristics were collected in forms that were separate from those used for other variables. These two sets of forms were merged using household registration numbers that were supposed to be identical for forms that were related. Some of these related forms were erroneously filled with different numbers that could not be rectified and therefore the study participants had to be dropped for this analysis as they could not be assigned their rightful economic status. b Proportion of nets obtained from all shown net sources |
||||||
|
Khatib et al. Malaria Journal 2008 7:98 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-98 |
||||||
