Table 2

Follow-up of former participants and comparison with matched controls.


Former participants
Matched colleagues

Responses
41/60 (68%)
19
Speciality:


     Doctor
46.3% (19/41)
53.6% (10/19)
     Entomologist
12.2% (5/41)
15.8% (3/19)
     Participant researcher
14.6% (5/41)
15.8% (3/19)
     Pharmacist
7.3% (3/41)

     Specialist technician
4.9% (2/41)
5.3% (1/19)
     Lecturer-researcher
4.9% (2/41)

     Other
9.8% (4/41)
10.5% (2/19)
Better able to assume functions since the training
Yes for 88% (36/41)
-
Better able to give presentations
Yes for 73% (30/41)
Yes for 58% (11/19)
Better able to train others
Yes for 80% (33/41)
Yes for 68% (13/19)
Better professional relations since the training
Yes for 85% (35/41)
-
Development of new activities since the training
Yes for 80% (33/41)
-
Development of a project as:


     Principal investigator
Yes for 34% (14/41)
Yes for 37% (7/19)
     Collaborator
Yes for 68% (28/41)
Yes for 68% (13/19)
Obtained funding as:


     Principal investigator
Yes for 20% (8/41)
Yes for 21% (4/19)
     Collaborator
Yes for 44% (18/41)
Yes for 37% (7/19)
Training has helped with grant applications and obtaining funding
Yes for 63% (26/41)
-
Change in professional activities since the training (as assessed by third party/superior)
Yes for 78% (32/41)
-

The survey of matched controls included colleagues of former participants. The questionnaires were distributed, by the former participants, to colleagues with similar training, in a similar post, dealing with malaria, tuberculosis or AIDS.

Domarle et al. Malaria Journal 2008 7:80   doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-80

Open Data