Table 6

SES differences in perceptions of ease of receiving treatment for malaria from providers


Inyi
Udi
Oji
Nachi

n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)

Traditional healer




Q1: most poor
42 (29)
34 (33)
14 (21)
109 (35)
Q2:average
58 (39)
40 (39)
27 (40)
104 (33)
Q3: least poor
47 (32)
29 (28)
26 (39)
98 (32)
Chi square (p-value)
4.6 (0.1)
2.4 (0.3)
6.0 (.051)
8.6 (0.01)
Concentration index
0.02
-0.03
0.13
-0.10

Private hospital




Q1: most poor
66 (31)
67 (33)
35 (19)
20 (25)
Q2:average
75 (35)
64 (32)
82 (43)
26 (32)
Q3: least poor
74 (34)
72 (35)
72 (38)
35 (43)
Chi square (p-value)
1.8 (0.4)
1.5 (0.5)
42.7 (.0001)
6.2 (0.04)
Concentration index
0.02
0.01
0.14
0.07

Public hospital




Q1: most poor
27 (27)
53 (30)
54 (23)
6 (30)
Q2:average
43 (43)
63 (36)
95 (40)
6 (30)
Q3: least poor
29 (29)
59 (34)
88 (37)
8 (40)
Chi square (p-value)
6.3 (0.04)
1.9 (0.4)
39.1 (.0001)
0.5 (0.8)
Concentration index
0.02
0.03
0.10
0.07

Patent medicine dealers




Q1: most poor
82 (32)
100 (34)
57 (25)
96 (32)
Q2:average
89 (34)
97 (33)
84 (37)
101 (34)
Q3: least poor
88 (34)
98 (33)
85 (38)
100 (34)
Chi square (p-value)
1.3 (0.5)
0.5 (0.8)
20.7 (.0001)
3.4 (0.2)
Concentration index
0.02
-0.01
0.17
0.02

Community-health workers




Q1: most poor
36 (26)
8 (32)
11 (25)
28 (35)
Q2:average
51 (37)
6 (24)
18 (41)
30 (38)
Q3: least poor
51 (37)
11 (44)
15 (34)
21 (27)
Chi square (p-value)
5.5 (0.07)
1.7 (0.4)
1.8 (0.40)
2.0 (0.4)
Concentration index
0.00
0.08
0.07
-0.04

Health centre




Q1: most poor
38 (28)
39 (34)
26 (44)
55 (55)
Q2:average
47 (34)
41 (35)
15 (25)
28 (28)
Q3: least poor
52 (38)
36 (31)
18 (31)
17 (17)
Chi square (p-value)
3.8 (0.2)
0.4 (0.8)
4.0 (0.14)
31.7 (0.01)
Concentration index
0.06
-0.02
-0.08
-0.25

Onwujekwe et al. Malaria Journal 2008 7:5   doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-5

Open Data