Table 4

SES differences in perceptions of geographic proximity of the health care providers


Inyi
Udi
Oji
Nachi

n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)

Traditional healer




Q1: most poor
45 (29)
37 (32)
13 (16)
107 (35)
Q2:average
58 (38)
41 (36)
35 (44)
101 (33)
Q3: least poor
50 (33)
36 (32)
31 (39)
99 (32)
Chi square (p-value)
2.9 (0.2)
0.5 (0.8)
13.5 (0.001)
3.4 (0.2)
Concentration index
0.03
0.00
0.11
-0.01

Private hospital




Q1: most poor
77 (29)
86 (34)
31 (17)
7 (14)
Q2:average
98 (37)
83 (32)
80 (45)
21 (42)
Q3: least poor
91 (34)
87 (34)
68 (38)
22 (44)
Chi square (p-value)
10.3 (0.01)
0.6 (0.7)
44.9 (0.0001)
10.4 (0.01)
Concentration index
0.03
0.02
0.15
0.21

Public hospital




Q1: most poor
25 (33)
91 (32)
53 (23)
0 (0)
Q2:average
22 (29)
92 (33)
95 (40)
3 (75)
Q3: least poor
29 (38)
99 (35)
87 (37)
1 (25)
Chi square (p-value)
1.3 (0.5)
3.7 (0.2)
39.8 (.0001)
3.5 (0.2)
Concentration index
0.03
0.02
0.10


Patent medicine dealers




Q1: most poor
80 (29)
105 (33)
59 (25)
104 (33)
Q2:average
93 (34)
108 (34)
84 (37)
106 (34)
Q3: least poor
99 (36)
105 (33)
87 (38)
105 (33)
Chi square (p-value)
9.4 (0.01)
1.8 (0.4)
20.2 (0.0001)
3.2 (0.2)
Concentration index
0.06
0.00
0.10
0.01

Community-health workers




Q1: most poor
47 (28)
18 (26)
9 (18)
9 (17)
Q2:average
65 (39)
22 (32)
17 (35)
22 (42)
Q3: least poor
55 (33)
29 (42)
23 (47)
21 (40)
Chi square (p-value)
5.5 (0.06)
3.6 (0.2)
7.7 (0.022)
7.5 (0.02)
Concentration index
0.03
0.11
0.21
0.14

Health centre




Q1: most poor
45 (27)
68 (32)
24 (41)
71 (40)
Q2:average
63 (37)
72 (34)
19 (32)
54 (30)
Q3: least poor
60 (36)
70 (33)
16 (27)
53 (30)
Chi square (p-value)
6.4 (0.04)
0.3 (0.8)
1.8 (0.41)
6.7 (0.04)
Concentration index
0.00
0.02
-0.08
-0.15

Onwujekwe et al. Malaria Journal 2008 7:5   doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-5

Open Data