Overuse of artemisinin-combination therapy in Mto wa Mbu (river of mosquitoes), an area misinterpreted as high endemic for malaria

doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-232

Malaria Journal

Volume 7

Viewing options:

Abstract
Full text
PDF (333KB)

Associated material:

Related literature:

Articles citing this article
on Google Scholar
on ISI Web of Science
on PubMed Central
Other articles by authors
on Google Scholar

Mwanziva C
Shekalaghe S
Ndaro A
Mengerink B
Megiroo S
Mosha F
Sauerwein R
Drakeley C
Gosling R
Bousema T

on PubMed

Mwanziva C
Shekalaghe S
Ndaro A
Mengerink B
Megiroo S
Mosha F
Sauerwein R
Drakeley C
Gosling R
Bousema T
Related articles/pages
on Google

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Tools:

Post to:

Research

Overuse of artemisinin-combination therapy in Mto wa Mbu (river of mosquitoes), an area misinterpreted as high endemic for malaria

Charles Mwanziva¹^,2 , Seif Shekalaghe¹^,3 , Arnold Ndaro² , Bianca Mengerink¹ , Simon Megiroo⁴ , Frank Mosha³ , Robert Sauerwein¹ , Chris Drakeley⁵^,6 , Roly Gosling⁶ and Teun Bousema¹

¹Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

²Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania

³Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania

⁴KKKT Kirurumo Health Facility Mto wa Mbu, Tanzania

⁵Joint Malaria Programme, Moshi, Tanzania

⁶Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

author email corresponding author email

Malaria Journal 2008, 7:232doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-232


Published:	5 November 2008

Abstract

Background

Adequate malaria diagnosis and treatment remain major difficulties in rural sub-Saharan Africa. These issues deserve renewed attention in the light of first-line treatment with expensive artemisinin-combination therapy (ACT) and changing patterns of transmission intensity. This study describes diagnostic and treatment practices in Mto wa Mbu, an area that used to be hyperendemic for malaria, but where no recent assessments of transmission intensity have been conducted.

Methods

Retrospective and prospective data were collected from the two major village health clinics. The diagnosis in prospectively collected data was confirmed by microscopy. The level of transmission intensity was determined by entomological assessment and by estimating sero-conversion rates using anti-malarial antibody responses.

Results

Malaria transmission intensity by serological assessment was equivalent to < 1 infectious bites per person per year. Despite low transmission intensity, > 40% of outpatients attending the clinics in 2006–2007 were diagnosed with malaria. Prospective data demonstrated a very high overdiagnosis of malaria. Microscopy was unreliable with < 1% of slides regarded as malaria parasite-positive by clinic microscopists being confirmed by trained research microscopists. In addition, many 'slide negatives' received anti-malarial treatment. As a result, 99.6% (248/249) of the individuals who were treated with ACT were in fact free of malaria parasites.

Conclusion

Transmission intensity has dropped considerably in the area of Mto wa Mbu. Despite this, most fevers are still regarded and treated as malaria, thereby ignoring true causes of febrile illness and over-prescribing ACT. The discrepancy between the perceived and actual level of transmission intensity may be present in many areas in sub-Saharan Africa and calls for greater efforts in defining levels of transmission on a local scale to help rational drug-prescribing behaviour.