Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessMethodology

A tool box for operational mosquito larval control: preliminary results and early lessons from the Urban Malaria Control Programme in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Ulrike Fillinger1 email, Khadija Kannady2 email, George William2 email, Michael J Vanek3 email, Stefan Dongus3,4 email, Dickson Nyika5,6 email, Yvonne Geissbühler2,3,5 email, Prosper P Chaki1,2,5 email, Nico J Govella1,2,5 email, Evan M Mathenge7 email, Burton H Singer8 email, Hassan Mshinda5 email, Steven W Lindsay1 email, Marcel Tanner3 email, Deo Mtasiwa2 email, Marcia C de Castro9 email and Gerry F Killeen1,3,5 email

1Durham University, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, South Road, Durham DH13LE, UK

2Dar es Salaam City Council, Ministry of Regional Administration and Local Government, United Republic of Tanzania

3Swiss Tropical Institute, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, PO Box, 4002 Basel, Switzerland

4University of Freiburg, Department of Physical Geography, Freiburg, Germany

5Ifakara Health Research and Development Centre, Coordination Office, PO Box 78373, Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania

6Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania

7Kenya Medical Research Institute, PO Box 54840, Nairobi, Kenya, Africa

8Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ08544, USA

9Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Population and International Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA

author email corresponding author email

Malaria Journal 2008, 7:20doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-20

Published: 25 January 2008

Abstract

Background

As the population of Africa rapidly urbanizes, large populations could be protected from malaria by controlling aquatic stages of mosquitoes if cost-effective and scalable implementation systems can be designed.

Methods

A recently initiated Urban Malaria Control Programme in Dar es Salaam delegates responsibility for routine mosquito control and surveillance to modestly-paid community members, known as Community-Owned Resource Persons (CORPs). New vector surveillance, larviciding and management systems were designed and evaluated in 15 city wards to allow timely collection, interpretation and reaction to entomologic monitoring data using practical procedures that rely on minimal technology. After one year of baseline data collection, operational larviciding with Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis commenced in March 2006 in three selected wards.

Results

The procedures and staff management systems described greatly improved standards of larval surveillance relative to that reported at the outset of this programme. In the first year of the programme, over 65,000 potential Anopheles habitats were surveyed by 90 CORPs on a weekly basis. Reaction times to vector surveillance at observations were one day, week and month at ward, municipal and city levels, respectively. One year of community-based larviciding reduced transmission by the primary malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae s.l., by 31% (95% C.I. = 21.6–37.6%; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

This novel management, monitoring and evaluation system for implementing routine larviciding of malaria vectors in African cities has shown considerable potential for sustained, rapidly responsive, data-driven and affordable application. Nevertheless, the true programmatic value of larviciding in urban Africa can only be established through longer-term programmes which are stably financed and allow the operational teams and management infrastructures to mature by learning from experience.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.