Table 1 |
|||
|
Algorithms used to predict molecular features of potential malarial vaccine candidates and housed in MalVac. |
|||
| Algorithm |
Principle |
Role in MalVac |
Reference |
|
|
|||
| 1. MAAP |
Predicts Malarial adhesins and adhesins-like proteins based on Support Vector Machines |
Adhesin and Adhesin like protein prediction. |
[9] |
| 2. BLASTCLUST |
Clusters protein or DNA sequences based on pair wise matches found using the BLAST
algorithm in case of proteins or Mega BLAST algorithm for DNA. |
Paralogs finding |
[11] |
| 3. TMHMM Server v. 2.0 |
Predicts the transmembrane helices in proteins based on Hidden Markov Model. |
Transmembrane helices prediction |
[12] |
| 4. BetaWrap |
Predicts the right-handed parallel beta-helix supersecondary structural motif in primary
amino acid sequences by using beta-strand interactions learned from non-beta-helix
structures. |
Betawrap finding |
[13] |
| 5. TargetP1.1 |
Predicts the subcellular location of eukaryotic proteins based on the predicted presence
of any of the N-terminal presequences: chloroplast transit peptide (cTP), mitochondrial targeting peptide (mTP) or secretory pathway signal peptide (SP). |
Localization Prediction. |
[14] |
| 6. SignalP 3.0 |
Predicts the presence and location of signal peptide cleavage sites in amino acid
sequences from different organisms. The method incorporates a prediction of cleavage
sites and a signal peptide/non-signal peptide prediction based on a combination of
several artificial neural networks and hidden Markov models. |
Signal Peptide Prediction. |
[15] |
| 7. BlastP |
It uses the BLAST algorithm to compare an amino acid query sequence against a protein
sequence database. |
Prediction of similarity to human reference proteins. |
[16] |
| 8. Antigenic |
Predicts potentially antigenic regions of a protein sequence, based on occurrence
frequencies of amino acid residue types in known epitopes. |
Antigenic region prediction. |
[17] |
| 9. Conserved Domain Database and Search Service, v2.13 |
The Database is a collection of multiple sequence alignments for ancient domains and
full-length proteins. It is used to identify the conserved domains present in a protein
query sequence. |
Conserved Domain Finding |
[18] |
| 10. ABCPred |
Predict B cell epitope(s) in an antigen sequence, using artificial neural network. |
Linear B Cell Epitope Prediction. |
[19] |
| 11. BcePred |
Predicts linear B-cell epitopes, using physico-chemical properties. |
Linear B Cell Epitope Prediction. |
[20] |
| 12. Discotope 1.1 |
Predicts discontinuous B cell epitopes from protein three dimensional structures utilizing
calculation of surface accessibility (estimated in terms of contact numbers) and a
novel epitope propensity amino acid score. |
Conformational B Cell Epitope Prediction. |
[21] |
| 13. CEP |
The algorithm predicts epitopes of protein antigens with known structures. It uses
accessibility of residues and spatial distance cut-off to predict antigenic determinants
(ADs), conformational epitopes (CEs) and sequential epitopes (SEs). |
Conformational B Cell Epitope Prediction |
[22] |
| 14. NetMHC 2.2 |
Predicts binding of peptides to a number of different HLA alleles using artificial
neural networks (ANNs) and weight matrices. |
HLA Class I Epitope prediction. |
[23] |
| 15. MHCPred 2.0 |
MHCPred uses the additive method to predict the binding affinity of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II molecules and also to the Transporter associated with Processing
(TAP). Allele specific Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models were generated using partial least squares (PLS). |
MHC Class I and II epitope prediction. |
[24] |
| 16. Bimas |
Ranks potential 8-mer, 9-mer, or 10-mer peptides based on a predicted half-time of
dissociation to HLA class I molecules. The analysis is based on coefficient tables
deduced from the published literature by Dr. Kenneth Parker, Children's Hospital Boston. |
HLA Class I Epitope prediction. |
[25] |
| 17. Propred |
Predicts MHC Class-II binding regions in an antigen sequence, using quantitative matrices
derived from published literature. It assists in locating promiscous binding regions
that are useful in selecting vaccine candidates. |
Promiscous MHC Class II epitope prediction. |
[26] |
| 18. AlgPred |
Predicts allergens in query protein based on similarity to known epitopes, searching
MEME/MAST allergen motifs using MAST and assign a protein allergen if it have any
motif, search based on SVM modules and search with BLAST search against 2890 allergen-representative
peptides obtained from Bjorklund et al 2005 and assign a protein allergen if it has
a BLAST hit. |
Allergen Prediction |
[27] |
| 19. Allermatch |
Predicts the potential allergenicity of proteins by bioinformatics approaches as recommended
by the Codex alimentarius and FAO/WHO Expert consultation on allergenicity of foods
derived through modern biotechnology. |
Allergen Prediction |
[28] |
| 20. WebAllergen |
Predicts the potential allergenicity of proteins. The query protein is compared against
a set of pre-built allergenic motifs that have been obtained from 664 known allergen
proteins. |
Allergen Prediction |
[29] |
|
|
|||
|
Chaudhuri et al. Malaria Journal 2008 7:184 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-184 |
|||