Table 4

Day 28 failure rates estimated by four methods – AS+SP treatment



Day 28 failure rates



Year
Country &
Site
Method 1a
(per protocol)
Method 1b
Method 2a
(WHO 2001)
Method 2b

2002
Zambia, Maheba
21.7
13.2
15.4
29.8


[10.9–36.4]
[6.5–22.9]
[8.6–26.8]
[20.5–42.1]
2003
Angola, Kuito
1.2
1.2
1.1
2.3


[0–6.6]
[0–6.4]
[0.2–7.8]
[0.6–8.8]
2003
DRC, Boende
33.3
25.3
27.3
59.5


[21.9–46.3]
[16.4–36.0]
[18.7–38.9]
[48.8–70.5]
2003
S Sudan, Nuba
10.3
8.3
8.6
10.5


[3.9–21.2]
[3.1–17.3]
[4.0–18.2]
[5.4–19.9]
2003
Uganda, Amudat
7.9
6.8
6.8
8.0


[2.6–17.5]
[2.2–15.1]
[2.9–15.5]
[3.7–16.9]
2004
Congo, Kindamba
11.1
10.0
10.1
11.0


[4.9–20.7]
[4.4–18.8]
[5.2–19.2]
[5.9–20.2]
2004
DRC, Kabalo
2.3
2.0
2.0
11.8


[0–12.3]
[0–10.8]
[0.3–13.4]
[5.5–24.4]
2004
Guinea, Dabola
1.0
0.9
0.9
2.8


[0–5.5]
[0–5.2]
[0.1–6.5]
[0.9–8.5]

Ashley et al. Malaria Journal 2008 7:154   doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-154

Open Data