Table 3 |
|||||
|
Day 28 failure rates estimated by four methods – AL treatment |
|||||
| Day 28 failure rates % [CI95%] |
|||||
|
|
|||||
| Method 1a (per protocol) |
Method 1b |
Method 2a (WHO 2001) |
Method 2b |
||
|
|
|||||
| 2004 |
Angola, Caala |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| [0–6.1]* |
[0–6.0]* |
||||
| 2004 |
Congo, Kindamba |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
| [0–6.2] |
[0–6.0] |
[0.2–7.3] |
[0.1–6.8] |
||
| 2005 |
Burkina Faso, Bobo-Dioulasso |
3.2 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
| [0.9–8.1] |
[0.8–6.9] |
[1.1–7.3] |
[1.1–7.3] |
||
| 2005 |
Uganda, Tororo |
3.3 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
| [0.7–9.3] |
[0.3–4.7] |
[0.6–5.4] |
[0.6–5.7] |
||
|
|
|||||
|
*one-sided 97.5% Cis |
|||||
|
Ashley et al. Malaria Journal 2008 7:154 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-154 |
|||||
