Malaria Journal

official impact factor 3.49

Open Access Highly Access Research

Amodiaquine-artesunate vs artemether-lumefantrine for uncomplicated malaria in Ghanaian children: a randomized efficacy and safety trial with one year follow-up

George O Adjei4,1, Jorgen AL Kurtzhals4, Onike P Rodrigues1, Michael Alifrangis4, Lotte CG Hoegberg4, Emmanuel D Kitcher3, Ebenezer V Badoe1, Roberta Lamptey2 and Bamenla Q Goka1*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Child Health, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, University of Ghana Medical School, P. O. Box KB 4236, Accra, Ghana

2 Polyclinic, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana

3 Ear, Nose and Throat Unit, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana

4 Centre for Medical Parasitology at Department of Clinical Microbiology and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), and at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

For all author emails, please log on.

Malaria Journal 2008, 7:127 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-127

Published: 11 July 2008

Abstract

Background

Artesunate-amodiaquine (AS+AQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AM-L) are efficacious artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) regimens that have been widely adopted in sub-Saharan Africa. However, there is little information on the efficacy of these regimens on subsequent episodes beyond 28 days, or on the safety of repeated treatments.

Methods

Children aged six months to 14 years with uncomplicated malaria were randomly assigned to treatment with AS+AQ (n = 116), or AM-L (n = 111). Recruited subjects were followed-up, initially for 28 days, and then monthly for up to one year. All subsequent attacks of uncomplicated malaria after 28 days were treated with the same regimen as at randomization. Investigations aimed at determining efficacy and side effects were conducted.

Results

Adequate clinical and parasitological response in subjects with evaluable end-points were, 97.1% (100/103) and 98.2% (107/109) on day 14, and 94.2% (97/103) and 95.3% (102/107) on day 28 in the AM-L and AS+AQ groups, respectively. Similar results were obtained after PCR correction. The incidence of malaria attacks in the year following recruitment was similar between the two treatment groups (p = 0.93). There was a high incidence of potentially AQ-resistant parasites in the study area. The incidence of adverse events, such as pruritus, fatigue and neutropaenia were similar in the two treatment groups. No patient showed signs of hearing impairment, and no abnormal neurological signs were observed during one year of follow-up. Other adverse events were mild in intensity and overlapped with known malaria symptomatology. No adverse event exacerbation was observed in any of the subjects who received multiple treatment courses with these ACT regimens during one year follow-up.

Conclusion

AS+AQ and AM-L were efficacious for treatment of children with uncomplicated malaria in Ghana and drug-related adverse events were rare in treated subjects during one year of follow-up. The high prevalence of potentially AQ resistant parasites raises questions about the utility of AQ as a partner drug for ACT in Ghana. The efficacy of AS+AQ in Ghana requires, therefore, continuous monitoring and evaluation.

Trial registration

NCT 00406146 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov webcite