Malaria Journal
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 ResearchThe costs and effects of a nationwide insecticide-treated net programme: the case of MalawiWarren Stevens1 , Virginia Wiseman2 , Juan Ortiz3 and Desmond Chavasse4  1
MRC Laboratories, PO Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia 2
Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK 3
UNICEF, P.O. Box 30375. Lilongwe 3, Malawi 4
PSI Malaria Department, Po Box 22591-0400, Nairobi, Kenya author email corresponding author email
Malaria Journal 2005,
4:22doi:10.1186/1475-2875-4-22 Abstract
Background
Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are a proven intervention to reduce the burden of malaria, yet there remains a debate as to the best method of ensuring they are universally utilized. This study is a cost-effectiveness analysis of an intervention in Malawi that started in 1998, in Blantyre district, before expanding nationwide. Over the 5-year period, 1.5 million ITNs were sold.
Methods
The costs were calculated retrospectively through analysis of expenditure data. Costs and effects were measured as cost per treated-net year (cost/TNY) and cost per net distributed.
Results
The mean cost/TNY was calculated at $4.41, and the mean cost/ITN distributed at $2.63. It also shows evidence of economies of scale, with the cost/TNY falling from $7.69 in year one (72,196 ITN) to $3.44 in year five (720,577 ITN). Cost/ITN distributed dropped from $5.04 to $1.92.
Conclusion
Combining targeting and social marketing has the potential of being both cost-effective and capable of achieving high levels of coverage, and it is possible that increasing returns to scale can be achieved. |