Open Access Open Badges Research

Improved clinical and laboratory skills after team-based, malaria case management training of health care professionals in Uganda

Allen Namagembe1, Umaru Ssekabira1, Marcia R Weaver2*, Nancy Blum3, Sarah Burnett3, Grant Dorsey4, Lydia Mpanga Sebuyira12, Alex Ojaku1, Gisela Schneider5, Kelly Willis3 and Adoke Yeka6

Author Affiliations

1 Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda

2 International Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

3 Accordia Global Health Foundation, 1101 14th Street, NW, Suite 801, Washington, DC, USA

4 Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

5 DIFAEM, Paul Lechler Strasse 24, D 72076 Tubingen, Germany

6 Uganda Malaria Surveillance Program, c/o Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda

For all author emails, please log on.

Malaria Journal 2012, 11:44  doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-44

Published: 13 February 2012



Deployment of highly effective artemisinin-based combination therapy for treating uncomplicated malaria calls for better targeting of malaria treatment to improve case management and minimize drug pressure for selecting resistant parasites. The Integrated Management of Malaria curriculum was developed to train multi-disciplinary teams of clinical, laboratory and health information assistants.


Evaluation of training was conducted in nine health facilities that were Uganda Malaria Surveillance Programme (UMSP) sites. From December 2006 to June 2007, 194 health professionals attended a six-day course. One-hundred and one of 118 (86%) clinicians were observed during patient encounters by expert clinicians at baseline and during three follow-up visits approximately six weeks, 12 weeks and one year after the course. Experts used a standardized tool for children less than five years of age and similar tool for patients five or more years of age. Seventeen of 30 laboratory professionals (57%) were assessed for preparation of malaria blood smears and ability to interpret smear results of 30 quality control slides.


Percentage of patients at baseline and first follow-up, respectively, with proper history-taking was 21% and 43%, thorough physical examination 18% and 56%, correct diagnosis 51% and 98%, treatment in compliance with national policy 42% and 86%, and appropriate patient education 17% and 83%. In estimates that adjusted for individual effects and a matched sample, relative risks were 1.86 (95% CI: 1.20,2.88) for history-taking, 2.66 (95%CI: 1.60,4.41) for physical examination, 1.77 (95%CI: 1.41,2.23) for diagnosis, 1.96 (95%CI: 1.46,2.63) for treatment, and 4.47 (95%CI: 2.68,7.46) for patient education. Results were similar for subsequent follow-up and in sub-samples stratified by patient age. Quality of malaria blood smear preparation improved from 21.6% at baseline to 67.3% at first follow-up (p < 0.008); sensitivity of interpretation of quality control slides increased from 48.6% to 70.6% (p < 0.199) and specificity increased from 72.1% to 77.2% (p < 0.736). Results were similar for subsequent follow-up, with the exception of a significant increase in specificity (94.2%, p < 0.036) at one year.


A multi-disciplinary team training resulted in statistically significant improvements in clinical and laboratory skills. As a joint programme, the effects cannot be distinguished from UMSP activities, but lend support to long-term, on-going capacity-building and surveillance interventions.