Malaria Journal

official impact factor 3.49

Open Access Highly Access Research

Monitoring fever treatment behaviour and equitable access to effective medicines in the context of initiatives to improve ACT access: baseline results and implications for programming in six African countries

Megan Littrell1*, Hellen Gatakaa1, Illah Evance1, Stephen Poyer1, Julius Njogu1, Tsione Solomon1, Erik Munroe1, Steven Chapman2, Catherine Goodman3, Kara Hanson3, Cyprien Zinsou4, Louis Akulayi5, Jacky Raharinjatovo6, Ekundayo Arogundade7, Peter Buyungo8, Felton Mpasela9, Cherifatou B Adjibabi10, Jean A Agbango11, Benjamin F Ramarosandratana12, Babajide Coker13, Denis Rubahika14, Busiku Hamainza15, Tanya Shewchuk1, Desmond Chavasse1 and Kathryn A O'Connell1

Author Affiliations

1 Population Services International, Malaria & Child Survival Department, P.O. Box 43640, Nairobi, Kenya, Africa

2 Population Services International, 1120 19th Street N.W., 20036, Washington D.C., USA

3 Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK

4 Associoation Beninoise pour le Marketing Socia/PSI, B.P. 08-0876, Tri Postal, Cotonou, Benin, Africa

5 Association de Santé Familiale, 232 Avenue Tombalbaye, Immeuble Socir, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, Africa

6 PSI/Madagascar, Immeuble-FIARO, Rue Jules RANAIVO, ESCALIER-D, 2eme Etage, BP 7748, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar, Africa

7 Society for Family Health, 8 Port Harcourt Crescent, Area 11 Garki Abuja, Nigeria, Africa

8 PACE, Plot 2 Ibis Vale, P.O. Box 27659, Kololo, Kampala, Uganda, Africa

9 Society for Family Health, Plot No. 549, Ridgeway, P.O. Box 50770, Lusaka, Zambia, Africa

10 National Malaria Control Program, Benin, Africa

11 Malaria National Program, Ministry of Health, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Africa

12 Ministry of Health, Madagascar, Africa

13 National Malaria Control Programme, Nigeria, Africa

14 National Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Uganda, Africa

15 National Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Zambia, Africa

For all author emails, please log on.

Malaria Journal 2011, 10:327 doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-327

Published: 31 October 2011

Abstract

Background

Access to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) remains limited in high malaria-burden countries, and there are concerns that the poorest people are particularly disadvantaged. This paper presents new evidence on household treatment-seeking behaviour in six African countries. These data provide a baseline for monitoring interventions to increase ACT coverage, such as the Affordable Medicines Facility for malaria (AMFm).

Methods

Nationally representative household surveys were conducted in Benin, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Madagascar, Nigeria, Uganda and Zambia between 2008 and 2010. Caregivers responded to questions about management of recent fevers in children under five. Treatment indicators were tabulated across countries, and differences in case management provided by the public versus private sector were examined using chi-square tests. Logistic regression was used to test for association between socioeconomic status and 1) malaria blood testing, and 2) ACT treatment.

Results

Fever treatment with an ACT is low in Benin (10%), the DRC (5%), Madagascar (3%) and Nigeria (5%), but higher in Uganda (21%) and Zambia (21%). The wealthiest children are significantly more likely to receive ACT compared to the poorest children in Benin (OR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.12-6.42); the DRC (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.12-4.24); Madagascar (OR = 5.37, 95% CI = 1.58-18.24); and Nigeria (OR = 6.59, 95% CI = 2.73-15.89). Most caregivers seek treatment outside of the home, and private sector outlets are commonly the sole external source of treatment (except in Zambia). However, children treated in the public sector are significantly more likely to receive ACT treatment than those treated in the private sector (except in Madagascar). Nonetheless, levels of testing and ACT treatment in the public sector are low. Few caregivers name the national first-line drug as most effective for treating malaria in Madagascar (2%), the DRC (2%), Nigeria (4%) and Benin (10%). Awareness is higher in Zambia (49%) and Uganda (33%).

Conclusions

Levels of effective fever treatment are low and inequitable in many contexts. The private sector is frequently accessed however case management practices are relatively poor in comparison with the public sector. Supporting interventions to inform caregiver demand for ACT and to improve provider behaviour in both the public and private sectors are needed to achieve maximum gains in the context of improved access to effective treatment.

Keywords:
Malaria; ACT; diagnosis; treatment-seeking behaviour; public sector; private sector