Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Trends in malaria research in 11 Asian Pacific countries: an analysis of peer-reviewed publications over two decades

Finn Andersen1, Nick M Douglas12, Dorina Bustos3, Gawrie Galappaththy4, Gao Qi5, Michelle S Hsiang6, Rita Kusriastuti7, Kamini Mendis8, George Taleo9, Maxine Whittaker10, Ric N Price12 and Lorenz von Seidlein1*

Author Affiliations

1 Global Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0811, Australia

2 Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, UK

3 Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Department of Health, FICC, Alabang, Muntinlupa City, Philippines

4 National Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka

5 Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214064, P.R.China

6 Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, USA

7 Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Republic of Indonesia

8 World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

9 Malaria & Vector Borne Diseases Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Vanuatu

10 Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

Malaria Journal 2011, 10:131  doi:10.1186/1475-2875-10-131

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Received:1 March 2011
Accepted:18 May 2011
Published:18 May 2011

© 2011 Andersen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.



Quantitative data are lacking on published malaria research. The purpose of the study is to characterize trends in malaria-related literature from 1990 to 2009 in 11 Asian-Pacific countries that are committed to malaria elimination as a national goal.


A systematic search was conducted for articles published from January 1990 to December 2009 in PubMed/MEDLINE using terms for malaria and 11 target countries (Bhutan, China, North Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vanuatu). The references were collated and categorized according to subject, Plasmodium species, and whether they contained original or derivative data.


2,700 articles published between 1990 and 2009 related to malaria in the target countries. The annual output of malaria-related papers increased linearly whereas the overall biomedical output from these countries grew exponentially. The percentage of malaria-related publications was nearly 3% (111/3741) of all biomedical publications in 1992 and decreased to less than 1% (118/12171; p < 0.001) in 2009. Thailand had the highest absolute output of malaria-related papers (n = 1211), followed by China (n = 609) and Indonesia (n = 346). Solomon Islands and Vanuatu had lower absolute numbers of publications, but both countries had the highest number of publications per capita (1.3 and 2.5 papers/1,000 population). The largest percentage of papers concerned the epidemiology and control of malaria (53%) followed by studies of drugs and drug resistance (47%). There was an increase in the proportion of articles relating to epidemiology, entomology, biology, molecular biology, pathophysiology and diagnostics from the first to the second decade, whereas the percentage of papers on drugs, clinical aspects of malaria, immunology, and social sciences decreased.


The proportion of malaria-related publications out of the overall biomedical output from the 11 target Asian-Pacific countries is decreasing. The discovery and evaluation of new, safe and effective drugs and vaccines is paramount. In addition the elimination of malaria will require operational research to implement and scale up interventions.


Research and development play a major role in many enterprises. A typical ratio of research and development for an industrial company is about 3.5% of revenues while in some pharmaceutical companies this ratio may be several-fold higher [1]. Although malaria control and elimination is not an industrial enterprise, most experts would agree that efforts supported by evidence and new tools are more likely to be successful. Very little quantitative data have been published to quantify the malaria research effort particularly in the malaria endemic countries of Asia. The lack of knowledge of research outputs reflects the intrinsic difficulties in quantifying these measures. The number of publications is an indirect measure of scientific research outputs and activities. Although not all research results in a publication, there is a broad consensus that scientific publications reflect the research effort and funding opportunities.

There is uncertainty about what tools are needed and how tools should be used in order to achieve elimination. In this context research and development will play a pivotal role in shaping future malaria elimination activities. Much can be learned from successful programmes, but the heterogeneity of the malaria epidemiology between nations makes it essential to adapt programmes to the current local needs. In 2009, 11 countries in the Asian Pacific region announced national goals to eliminate malaria (Bhutan, China, North Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vanuatu), and together established the Asian Pacific Malaria Elimination Network ( webcite). To develop a better understanding of the malaria research outputs and activities in these APMEN countries, the number of peer-reviewed publications has been reviewed, with the purpose of characterizing trends in malaria-related literature over the last two decades.


The target countries

The 11 APMEN countries have made significant progress towards malaria elimination on a national or sub national level, and have made an official commitment toward elimination. The population of the countries included in this study varied greatly, ranging from 246,000 people in Vanuatu to 1,381,796,000 in China (Table 1)[2]. Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita varied from USD 16,700 in South Korea to USD 1,200 in the Solomon Islands [2]. The population at risk of vivax malaria ranged from 461,951,000 in China to 242,000 in Vanuatu [3]. The largest population at risk of falciparum malaria was 132,878,000, found in Indonesia [4,5].

Table 1. Key demographic and economic data from the 11 APMEN countries

Criteria for considering articles for this review

Articles with an abstract in English language relating to malaria in the 11 target countries within the time frame of January 1990 to December 2009 were included in the study. The search methods for acquiring article references are described in supplementary materials (Additional files 1, 2 and 3).

Additional file 1. country search algorithm

Format: DOC Size: 36KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Processing reference library

The publication type for each article was derived from the PubMed/Medline database and articles were categorized as containing original data, or non-original, derivative data or being irrelevant to malaria research based on these publication types (see Additional file 2). References not provided with a publication type were manually tagged. Each paper was assigned to at least one of the following subjects based on the keywords included in the reference: Diagnostics, Molecular/Genetics, Clinical, Entomology/Insecticides, Biology/Biochemistry, Social Sciences/Health Policy, Epidemiology/Control, Immunology/Vaccines, Pathophysiology, Drugs/Drug resistance [6]. The search algorithm used to categorize the papers is shown in Additional file 3.

Additional file 2. study-type search algorithm

Format: DOC Size: 29KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 3. subject search algorithm

Format: DOC Size: 41KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

All papers were further classified as relating to Plasmodium falciparum or P. vivax depending on whether the term 'falciparum' or 'vivax' appeared in the title, abstract or keywords. Malaria-related papers in which the Plasmodium species was not defined were categorized as "neither". These papers were manually reviewed to assess their relevance for malaria and excluded if they were not sufficiently relevant. Articles were also classified as describing clinical trials if their publication type field contained 'clinical' or 'randomized controlled'.

The total number of overall biomedical publications from the target countries were gathered by removing the keywords for malaria (P. falciparum, P. vivax) from the search algorithm.


Data were processed using Excel (Microsoft, WA, USA) filters and Excel was also used to compute the correlation coefficient r2. Statistical comparisons were computed with Statcalc (EpiInfo, version 6, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA). For categorical variables, percentages and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using Wilson's method. Proportions were examined using χ2 with Yates' correction.


In total, 2,700 unique malaria-related, peer-reviewed references published between 1990 and 2009 were identified as associated with the 11 target countries. Of these papers 1,903 (70%) were articles containing original data and 319 (12%) were articles containing derivative data. The remaining papers (478; 18%) were found to be insufficiently related to malaria. The assembly of references by country and subjects is shown in Figure 1.

thumbnailFigure 1. Assembly of references.

To visualize general trends in peer reviewed publications, the number of malaria-related publications was graphed and compared with overall biomedical publications over time (Figure 2). Over the 20-year study period, the number of malaria-related publications rose 2.1 fold in a linear fashion (linear trendline with r2 = 0.66), from 64 per year in 1990 to 136 per year in 2009. In the first decade of analysis 980 malaria-related publications were identified, increasing to 1,242 during the following decade. The proportion of papers reporting original data remained relatively stable throughout the two decades at around 85%. Over the same period the number of biomedical publications relating to the target countries increased exponentially (exponential trendline with r2 = 0.95). The total number of biomedical publications increased from 40,567 in the decade from 1990 through 1999 to 113,714 in the decade from 2000 through 2009. The percentage of malaria-related publications was nearly 3% (111/3,741) of all biomedical publications in 1992 and decreased yearly to less than 1% (118/12,171) by 2005, staying below 1% thereafter (p < 0.001; Figure 3).

thumbnailFigure 2. The yearly number of malaria-related and all biomedical publications other than malaria from the 11 target countries, 1990 to 2009.

thumbnailFigure 3. The percentage of malaria-related out of total biomedical papers by year of publication.

Publication output by country

Thailand had the highest output of malaria-related papers (n = 1,211), followed by China (n = 609) and Indonesia (n = 346). The output of malaria-related publications for Thailand, China, Indonesia, South Korea and North Korea increased steadily (Figure 4). Following the re-emergence of vivax malaria in 1993, North and South Korea experienced the greatest relative increase in publications from the first decade to the second (512% and 422% respectively). Although the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu had some of the lowest absolute numbers of publications, they had the highest number of publications per capita (1.3 and 2.5 papers/1000 population). Only two malaria-related papers during the 20-year period were associated with Bhutan [7,8]. There was a weak correlation between the size of the population at risk of malaria in a country and the numbers of papers on malaria-related to the country (r2 = 0.13). There was no correlation between the GDP per capita, human development index, health expenditure per capita and the number of publications from a country.

thumbnailFigure 4. The number of malaria-related articles in each country per 5 year period.

Publication output by subject of publication

Publications were categorized into 10 subjects and charted for the first and second decades of the study; Figure 5. The epidemiology and control of malaria accounted for 53% (1,183/2,222) of publications, followed by drugs and drug resistance (47% 1,032/2,222; p < 0.001)). Between the first and second decade there was an increase in the proportion of articles on epidemiology (1.15 fold; p < 0.001), entomology (1.24 fold; p < 0.001), biology, molecular biology, pathophysiology and diagnostics. In contrast there was a decrease in the proportion of papers on immunology (0.67; p < 0.001), clinical aspects of malaria (0.78 fold; p < 0.001), drugs (0.95 fold; p = 0.3), and social sciences (0.91; p = 0.4).

thumbnailFigure 5. Percentage of malaria-related articles by topic, 1990-1999 and 2000-2009.

Publication output by parasite species

The proportions of papers on P. vivax and P. falciparum are shown in Figure 6. The proportion of all articles associated with P. falciparum decreased from 67% (661/980) in the first decade to 56% (703/1242) in the second (p < 0.001). In contrast, the proportion of articles associated with P. vivax fluctuated between 22% and 38%, with no major change from the first decade (30%, 296/980) to the second (32%, 403/1242; p = 0.5). In only two countries (North Korea 89%; 42/47 and South Korea 81%; 98/121) did the majority of malaria-related papers deal with P. vivax and not with P. falciparum. Malaria-related articles not explicitly relating to either species increased from 22% (215/980) in the 1990's to an average of 29% (361/1242) in the second decade (p < 0.001). This group of publications mostly included papers on molecular mechanisms, entomology and insecticides but also the less frequently encountered human Plasmodium sp. (ovale, malariae, knowlesi). Overall there were more publications on P. falciparum compared with P. vivax (Figure 7), with the total ratio being 1.95 P. falciparum related articles for every P. vivax article (95%CI 1.89 to 2.00). The trend of P. falciparum articles being dominant was apparent within each subject, with the exception of Social Sciences/Health Policy, where the proportion of articles that did not relate specifically to either Plasmodium species was higher than the proportion that did. The majority of articles describing clinical trials related to P. falciparum (85%; 260/307). But the proportion of publications describing clinical trials relating to P. falciparum decreased steadily over the two decades from 89% (62/70) between 1990 and 1995 to 81% (52/64) between 2005 and 2009 (p = 0.2) In contrast the percentage of publications describing clinical studies relating to P. vivax or neither species remained stable.

thumbnailFigure 6. Comparison of the yearly percentage of articles on Plasmodium vivax (PV) and falciparum (PF), 1990 to 2009 (with trendlines).

thumbnailFigure 7. Percentage of articles relating to Plasmodium vivax (Pv), falciparum (Pf) or both species by country*. *ROK = Republic of Korea, DRRK = Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Bhutan provided 2 data points and is not shown.


Malaria related publications from 11 Asian Pacific countries committed to malaria elimination increased in a linear fashion over the last two decades, doubling between 1990 and 2009. In contrast the overall biomedical output grew exponentially. This exponential growth has largely been driven by China, which increased its research output dramatically over the study period. Funding for global malaria research has increased substantially during the study period [9], yet this is not reflected in the number of malaria-related publications in APMEN countries. Over two decades, there has been a three-fold reduction in the proportion publications from the APMEN countries related to malaria; currently less than one percent of biomedical research is related to malaria. The reasons for this are likely to be complex. Potential explanations include the perceived decreased importance of malaria as its burden in the APMEN countries falls with successful control efforts. Simultaneously other areas of medical research, such as cancer have been growing rapidly with the changing economy and demography. Whilst the funding for malaria has increased in absolute terms, the funding for other medical disciplines has grown even faster and is now out-competing malaria research.

The research output per capita varied considerably between countries. Surprisingly no significant correlation could be detected between population at risk, GDP per capita, human development index, health expenditure per capita and the number of publications per capita. Other local factors are likely to play an important role in productivity. In Thailand for instance, one research unit produced over 800 publications on malaria over the last 20 years and has thus ensured the prominence of Thailand in terms of publication outputs. The proportion of research output specifically related to P. falciparum decreased whereas the proportion of articles relating to P. vivax remained relatively stable. This finding may reflect a healthy correction of research priorities as P. vivax creates a large proportion of malaria related morbidity in the APMEN countries.

The greatest number of articles relate to the subjects of epidemiology and control, which reassuringly suggests that controlling and monitoring the spread of malaria remains a key priority. In contrast, the number of publications related to clinical trials is steadily decreasing, perhaps reflecting a global policy change to artemisinin combination therapy and the relative low priority given to drug monitoring. This development may be short sighted given the invariable emergence and spread of drug resistant strains of Plasmodia [10-12].

The study has potential limitations in selection bias and misclassification. Research publications are not always an accurate mirror of research activities. Highly relevant operative research may not be published but are of great value for programmes. Furthermore the extent to which an individual country is associated with a particular publication may vary widely. Publications that did not clearly distinguish whether the paper was from South Korea, North Korea or both, were attributed to both Koreas. This may have resulted in an inflated number of papers attributed to North Korea because there were only a small number of articles specifically relating to North Korea compared to those relating to South Korea. Also, assigning a paper to one country or subject is inappropriate when multiple countries or subjects are involved. Hence search algorithms targeting the title, keywords and abstract were used to identify and assign papers to multiple countries and subjects. This approach was found accurate in spot checks. Compared to manually extracting data from the text, using computer algorithms improves reproducibility. Also this methodology can be rapidly applied and replicated to maintain ongoing surveillance of temporal trends in publication outputs. Lastly, papers that did not mention a specific Plasmodium species could not be assigned to either P. vivax or P. falciparum.

Despite the challenges, 79 countries eliminated malaria between 1945 and 2010. Of the remaining 99 endemic countries, about one third have reduced the burden of malaria to low levels, and are now working towards malaria elimination [13]. The methods required for the elimination of malaria in the 20th century may no longer be feasible or appropriate in the 21st Century. The social structures of the last century have been transformed. No longer can divisions of health care workers be commandeered in a top down approach. Parasite and vector resistance has rendered many insecticides and antimalarial drugs useless. There is an urgent need for basic research to discover safe and effective interventions to prevent and cure all forms of malaria. There is also an urgent need for operational research to assist program managers in the optimization, scaling up, and monitoring of interventions. Further work is needed to identify funding, prioritize research topics, strengthen capacity in endemic countries, and facilitate multi-country and institution collaborations such as APMEN, that have the potential to evaluate new interventions across a range of endemic environments.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FA searched the databases, analysed the data and contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. NMD provided advice regarding the analysis and contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. DB, GG, GQ, MSH, RK, KM, GT, and MW contributed to the interpretation of data and the drafting of the manuscript. RNP conceived of the study, and participated in its design and drafting of the manuscript. LvS participated in the design, contributed in the analysis and the drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We thank Simon Hay, Carlos Guerra and Pete Gething for the discussion and provision of data on populations at risk for malaria. Major funding for APMEN is provided by the the Australian Government via its international aid program AusAID. In 2009 AusAID made a commitment for ongoing support to APMEN which complements its broader support for malaria control and elimination.


  1. Johansson B, Lööf H: The Impact of Firm's R&D Strategy on Profit and Productivity. [] webcite

    CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series Stockholm: CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series; 2008. OpenURL

  2. The_World_Bank: World Development Indicators. [http:/ / data-catalog/ world-development-indicators?cid=GP D_WDI] webcite


  3. Guerra CA, Howes RE, Patil AP, Gething PW, Van Boeckel TP, Temperley WH, Kabaria CW, Tatem AJ, Manh BH, Elyazar IR, Baird JK, Snow RW, Hay SI: The international limits and population at risk of Plasmodium vivax transmission in 2009.

    PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010, 4:e774. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Guerra CA, Gikandi PW, Tatem AJ, Noor AM, Smith DL, Hay SI, Snow RW: The limits and intensity of Plasmodium falciparum transmission: implications for malaria control and elimination worldwide.

    PLoS Med 2008, 5:e38. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Hay SI, Guerra CA, Gething PW, Patil AP, Tatem AJ, Noor AM, Kabaria CW, Manh BH, Elyazar IR, Brooker S, Smith DL, Moyeed RA, Snow RW: A world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2007.

    PLoS Med 2009, 6:e1000048. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  6. Hommel M: 10 years of Malaria Journal: how did Open Access change publication patterns?

    Malar J 2010, 9:284. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  7. Bharate SB, Bhutani KK, Khan SI, Tekwani BL, Jacob MR, Khan IA, Singh IP: Biomimetic synthesis, antimicrobial, antileishmanial and antimalarial activities of euglobals and their analogues.

    Bioorg Med Chem 2006, 14:1750-1760. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Kondrashin AV: Malaria in the WHO Southeast Asia region.

    Indian J Malariol 1992, 29:129-160. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  9. Snow RW, Guerra CA, Mutheu JJ, Hay SI: International funding for malaria control in relation to populations at risk of stable Plasmodium falciparum transmission.

    PLoS Med 2008, 5:e142. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  10. Baird JK: Effectiveness of antimalarial drugs.

    N Engl J Med 2005, 352:1565-1577. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Dondorp AM, Yeung S, White L, Nguon C, Day NP, Socheat D, von Seidlein L: Artemisinin resistance: current status and scenarios for containment.

    Nat Rev Microbiol 2010, 8:272-280. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, Lwin KM, Ariey F, Hanpithakpong W, Lee SJ, Ringwald P, Silamut K, Imwong M, Chotivanich K, Lim P, Herdman T, An SS, Yeung S, Singhasivanon P, Day NP, Lindegardh N, Socheat D, White NJ: Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

    N Engl J Med 2009, 361:455-467. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Feachem RG, Phillips AA, Hwang J, Cotter C, Wielgosz B, Greenwood BM, Sabot O, Rodriguez MH, Abeyasinghe RR, Ghebreyesus TA, Snow RW: Shrinking the malaria map: progress and prospects.

    Lancet 2010, 376:1566-1578. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. WHO: World health statistics 2009. Geneva: World Health Organizations; 2009.

  15. International Human Development Indicators [] webcite

  16. WHO: Malaria Report: 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2010.